Im going against the tide!! Start Bulger.
A) Hes at home
B) Bulger has more points in every Fantasy Leauge than Hassellbeck
C) Torry Holt is in the TOP 3 for fantasy recivers along with Issac Bruce in the TOP 25. Those are good targets! So everyone whos saying Seattle has "Quality" recivers well the Rams have "Great" recivers!
D) Everyone is saying Alexanders out so he will be throwing alot...yeah well the Defense will be watching the pass more too. Ever heard people say that RBs take pressure of the QB well thats not just a myth.
For real Bulgers youre guy!
2006-10-09 16:05:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Matty James 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Start Bulger. Bulger has really been putting up the numbers. I think he will have a bet harder time with the Seattle D than with some other teams but he is still a good bet.
Also, Seattle has NO offense right now. The Sea Hawks are in a four wide offense, if they are going against a bad D they can do OK. But witness how the Bears chewed them up. Against a good D, the Hawks have few options. All the Rams have to do is defend against the pass, as it is obvious the Hawks won't run it.
2006-10-09 15:54:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kalliope 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hassellbeck may seem like a good choice becuase Alexander is out. But, being from the Seattle area, I would still go with Bulger. Being division rivals the Rams play especially tough against the Hawks. Also, Hassellbeck has not done as fair as Bulger in the past games they have played. Everyone says he will pass more bc Alexander is out but that just creates more opportunity for interceptions. So, personally I would go with Bulger. Good luck though.
2006-10-09 15:52:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kyle T 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would start Bulger. #1 reason, He's at home. #2 he's playing against a weaker pass D. Holt and Bulger seems to be really clicking. Hasselback last game a thrashing by the Bears.
2006-10-09 20:27:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by B E 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bulger. Hasselback plays in the city where it isnt sunny. And sunny is as sunny does. Like Chocolate. I have Rangers season tickets and I want to sell them. Who would take them? Bulger or Hasselbeck? Thats your answer. Machine Gun Man.
2006-10-09 15:39:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eliott W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definintely Hasselbeck. They both have quality receivers, but Seattle has no running game and a better defense, which means Bulger is more prone to turnovers.
2006-10-09 15:49:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by heluvajobu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd start Hasselbeck - he has good receivers and they are without Shaun Alexander for a while so he will be throwing a lot. The Seahawks defence is better though, so it's a tough call. I don't really think you can go wrong with either, but given the choice I would take Hasselbeck.
2006-10-09 15:44:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bearfrog 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Starting either one is fine, but if you've noticed, the last two weeks, St Louis has been absolutely awful defending the pass... see Detroit putting up a ton of yards with Williams/FURREY! two weeks ago and Gregg Jennings running wild. With Hasselbeck and any of his top 3, all of whom are better than anyone St. Louis has faced lately, it'll be a shootout. Hasselbeck with confidence.
2006-10-09 17:19:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Paris P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm specific not counting out any of the Hendricks drivers or Smoke for that be counted. those are adult males who've been racing lots longer than Kyle & frequently they don't start up making their circulate until eventually it gets right down to the Chase. verify out the consistency from Junior. he's held it in the suitable 10 all season so a ways.( supply me the thumbs down...I pronounced Junior.) whilst push includes shove, the communities relatively start up exhibiting their potential. there's a superb form of the drivers who realize it's time to knuckle down and get in the Chase. suitable now i'm not counting absolutely everyone out. it somewhat is instruct time now! =o`)
2016-12-16 05:03:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by salgueiro 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No question; Matt Hasselbeck
2006-10-09 15:48:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by big dawg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋