WHY DlD BUSH ALLOW NORTH KOREA TO DETONATE A NUKE?

Question

HE ALLOWS 9/11 TO HAPPEN, BIN LADEN STILL WALKS AROUND FREE, NOW THIS.

WHEN WILL PEOPLE WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT REPUBLICANS ARE WEAK ON DEFENSE. EVEN THOUGH THEY TALK TOUGH. THEY'RE REALLY LIKE LITTLE YAPPING LAP DOGS THAT DON'T KNOW HOW WEAK THEY REALLY ARE.

Answer 1

It will get the repuglican party a few votes when they spin it to sound like a threat to the U.S. the scared little neo-con girls will vote for them because George Bush and them "will keep us safe." I am sure that Rush Limbaugh and faux news writers are working on the script right now.

Answer 2

If he had done something you would have whined and moaned that he is a war monger. When we do finally go in there and we probably will because the U.N. is as usless as titts on a bore hog, you are going to whine some more and say he is so mean and such a bully no wonder the rest of the world hates us. Wah!!!It's going to always be a lose lose situation with you people and Bush. I'm an old man and can't wait to see how you guys handle things if you win the senate and the house back. God it's going to be a cluster f**k!

Answer 3

Bush probably encouraged the nuclear test, because the thing that he wants most right now is another arms race. I bet he'll have a hard on for the whole week because of it. The nuke test will be the perfect excuse for him to get the USA, and everyone else he can manipulate, into an arms race. The war industry will boom. Mark my words, by early next year, he will be preaching the case for more armaments, a military draft, and the deployment of the US military all over the world.

Answer 4

like the libs would support us going to war with North Korea and Bill Clinton cut spending on the military and intelligences that is why we didn't know that 9/11 was going to happen and if bill Clinton would not have given North Korea nuclear technology they wouldn't have detonated a nuke

Answer 5

For the Republicans who accuse Clinton of giving the nuclear reactors to North Korea, please investigate this matter further.

In 1994, a controversial agreement was indeed reached for the U.S. to provide North Korea with two light-water nuclear reactors in exchange for Pyongyang ending its nuclear weapons program.

This is true.

Current Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld sat on the board of the company (Zurich-based engineering giant ABB) that won a $200 million contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors.

This is also true.

Keep playing the Blame Game, boys and girls.

To Chainsaw (directly below me): I ask your President, what was HIS plan? For years, North Korea has requested a direct dialogue with the US. President Bush insisted that China, Russia, Japan, and South Korea take care of it instead. A direct dialogue was already happening under the Clinton administration. Bush ceased that dialogue as soon as he took office.

Look at the "Axis of Evil" that he described in 2002:

1) Iraq -- we all know how THAT'S turning out
2) Iran -- on its way to a nuclear program
3) North Korea -- detonating nuclear weapons tests

Where's the progress, I ask YOU.

Answer 6

Oct. 9th, 1967 a US trained Bolivian Special Forces Team captured Che Guevara. Oct. 9th, 2006, Bin Laden still walks freely. How is it that we can train a foreing Special Forces Team to capture Guevara, yet we can't catch Osama. I have woken up, I've been awake the whole time and I see through their disguise.

Answer 7

Because there are not enough people in this country willing to fight a violent war that we need to fight. All we accept is talking with the useless UN.

What is your plan liberal? You have none. The Republican plan is not perfect, but it is far better than anything Democrats propose or have done.

Answer 8

To preserve the right to do same as N Korea. USA also have many nuke war head.
Hypocracy.

Answer 9

The nuke only exists in North Korea because Clinton gave them the stuff to enrich Uranium.

Answer 10

Because he is looking for WMD someplace else. North Korea has them and tells the world they have them....but what are we going to do about it. If we try to take them away, what would stop them from using them. By the way, If WMD really existed in Iraq, don't you think they would have used them by now or instead of planes on 9/11?

Answer 11

Ah, so you favor preemptive strikes? Would it be okay if we listen in on their phone calls? What if we go in and find out he has no more WMDs? Never mind that the nuke is courtesy of Albright, Berger and Clinton. You wonder why we believe liberals are hypocrites.