how would Frege, Russell, early Wittgenstein of the Tractatus, and Ayer each analyze the statement "love makes the world go around"? please explain the reasoning of each, including goals of their particular approach.
2006-10-09 14:09:54 · 2 answers · asked by daffydil4_7 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The analysis by all Russel and Frege would be something like this:
the statement "love makes the world go around" is false, because in fact is "gravity that makes the world go around"
Wittgenstein would analyze the context of each word used, and acknowledge the ambiguity of language. Thus the statement can still be false if understood in physics context, but it can also be interpreted in social context as something like: "the human interactions in society are largely governed by love" which may or may not be true.
2006-10-10 07:05:54 · answer #1 · answered by hq3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As Buber would have ...in fact, did say
Love is the manifestation of the I-Thou
oh, not one on your list.....sorry
why not do your own research/readings????
and didn't I already say this on your other questions?
2006-10-09 17:32:29 · answer #2 · answered by Gemelli2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋