Ok so Korea have the BOMB but do you think they are as dangerous as the other 8 who also have Nukes?

Answer 1

they are all just as dangerous with nukes in their possesion. Think about how many lives will be lost if any one of those 8 released the nukes. If it was just used for nuclear power/electricity, i wouldn't mind. But if used as a weapon, I totally disapproved of having any at all (even from the other 8!).

Answer 2

No matter how you look at it, we can't consider these countries as dangerous because we allowed them to get the weapons in the first place by simply allowing them to exist.

Let's face it, since 1945 the very ability of every nation and person on earth to exist has been a gift from the USA. We had the bomb first but we didn't use it to prevent others from getting it. First we allowed Japan to continue to exist when many military people suggested finishing them off for good. The Soviet Union as well...by 1947 we could have wiped them off the face of the earth and never allowed them to build their own A bombs. Britain China and France may never have felt the need to build A bombs if the Soviet Union was an empty nuclear wasteland in 1950. When they did, no matter how history evolved, we could have considered them enemies and either demanded they stop or nuked London, Beijing and Paris. Fact is by 1960 we could have eliminated all the peoples of the earth outside our own country.

I'm not saying that I suggest this....just saying that the truth is the truth...we had the ability to do such things and chose not too. Perhaps the USA among a desolate nuclear wasteland of a planet was not the desire of our leaders.

Answer 3

They supposedly only tested a device intended for use in making a bomb. That is scary enough. This guy is an alcoholic psychopath. Completely dangerous. He is twisting arms to get what he wants whatever that is. I don't think that the world community will allow him to get much further than he is now. I don't know if it is wise for Bush to not talk to him but, I do think this is a global issue, not just ours. It will absolutely take the world community to get something done. Peacefully. Kim Jung Il is more dangerous than the 8 put together.

Answer 4

All of them have the potential to make people in the white house get nervous,so all of them who look unstable due to previous problems should be taken seriously.
What makes north Korea so dangerous is the fact that it is close to areas that are in close range with large populations,that it can pick and decide from.
And these areas if hit could destabilize a large part of the world economy. it would be better to see a mush room cloud at see than on land,caused by a nuclear fall out.

Answer 5

When Chernobyl blew up, the sheep in the NW of England became radioactive from the fallout blown over by the wind.
If North Korea do strike at South Korea or the US, the fallout will kill more in other countries not targeted by Korea than what the explosions will.
Nukes are a pointless deterrent, no-one wins!

Answer 6

If the other 8 are allowed a nuclear bomb then why shouldn`t S.Korea, I don`t think they are dangerous just over hyped. Lets look at history, America was the ones to use it cause harm to many lives? Does this answer your question.

Answer 7

Yes, because Kim Jo Main is an evil psycho tyrant and has no feelings of remorse or concern for anyone but himself. He wouldn't and isn't hurt by the suffering of his people, the starvation and poverty they are experiencing now. He won't mind using Nuclear bombs on anyone because he has no regard for human life. These are the worse people that can posses nuclear weapons. They are the suicidal people that believe God is on their side. This doesn't go for Kim, but the Al Quida.

Answer 8

Oh, a lot more dangerous. Well maybe not as dangerous as Iran. The Korean's just want them to use as a barganing chip or to threaten their neighbors.

The Isrealis wanted them to keep their neighbors in line.

Pakistan and India have each other and Russia and China to worry about.

The U.S. hasn't used one since WWII and nobody really believes they would use one so we may as well not even have them.

But, Iran gives their stuff like missles and other weapons to terrrorist. If you see a mushroom cloud over Pittsburg you can bet it will be from Iran, not Korea or Pakistan, or India or Isreal.

Answer 9

Truth is,we are all as dangerous as one another in this world now,doesn't matter who it is-once some one presses that button,in which ever country has nuke capabilities,we will all be put to sleep...and none of us are gonna wake up.

Answer 10

No! It should be all or none. If we really care then we should not have nuclear weapons in any country including Israel which possess 300 A bombs and no body talk about it!