I do and I would vote for him!!!
2006-10-09 13:35:20 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ABSOLUTELY!
2006-10-09 13:37:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
A resounding "NO"!
How Anti-American can one Republican be?
When the most popular president of all time, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was voted in for a fourth term of office the Republicans screamed "Bloody Murder" at the top of their "hot air" filled lungs. It was because of them that the laws were changed so that a president can only be in for 2 terms.
Isn't it funny though, whenever they get in they always want to change this law back to suit their whims? They tried it with Ronald (I don't recall) Reagan, and it didn't work. Now that Bush has the lowest approval rating of any president in history, why would they even consider opening up their lying pedophile mouths now?
2006-10-09 13:43:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh dear God, spare us!!! How can you even think such a horrible thing? My God, 4 more years of that psychotic, paranoid, schizophrenic, war-mongering ****** would mean the end of this country if he hasn't already brought us to our knees. We've already become the laughingstock of the world as this idiot and his pronouncements - most of which have been in some language other than English since nuke-you-lar isn't part of the English language - have brought us down to Third World status. And you'd want more of that? What's wrong with you? My advice - get thee to a psychiatrist now before its too late. Maybe you can still be helped.
2006-10-09 13:56:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Although I think Mr. Bush has done a fair job as President, I wouldn't vote for him for a third term. Personally, I'd like to see ALL politicians limited to a single term. Afterwards, they'd be put in a home somewhere and never, ever allowed to speak to the press. The day of the statesman is over, alas.
2006-10-09 13:46:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
hasn't he done enough damage with two terms noone should ever be allowed more than two terms there are good reasons we limit how long anyone can be presidant and George hasn't shown me any great leadership ablities that make me think that should change
2006-10-09 13:49:01 · answer #5 · answered by justasking 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Would the world survive a 3rd Bush term?
Let's hope and pray we can get through two more years...
2006-10-09 13:41:41 · answer #6 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not. It's against our constitution and a large part of the country's wishes. It would be neither just nor fair. 12 years is far too long for one person to govern a country.
2006-10-09 13:37:47 · answer #7 · answered by askalicious 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I like him but I do not think that would be a good idea. That would have meant Clinton would have probably gotten a third term as well.
2006-10-09 13:56:44 · answer #8 · answered by barter256 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush should be allowed his day in court.
2006-10-09 13:45:39 · answer #9 · answered by notme 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You poor thing. He can't thank God. If he could and the American people were stupid enough to vote for him again, I would leave this country because there would no hope for our future or our children's future. It's sad you can't see the damage this man has done. You must be very young or brain-washed.
2006-10-09 13:40:19 · answer #10 · answered by jeanhall 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. He's no more special than any other two termed President. He can go home, now. Mission accomplished!
2006-10-09 13:44:43 · answer #11 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋