English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Jimmy Carter's policy with North Korea, the result? Nukes...
today we see the fruit of that lunacy...Slick Willy Clinton...the same, regarding his posture towards: North Korea more Nukes!

So why do the Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Radical Liberal Democrats direct their non-stop Hell-bent efforts at bashing Bush instead of joining ranks against the real enemy?

Whats Hillary's solution? What's Kerry's solution? What pray tell is
'Dr." Howard Deans solution??? WHAT??

Why, Why, Why??? What, What, What ??? Enough already about Foley and Jerry Studds, Barney Franks amd Mark Reynold's sexploits and forays with Underage Pages and their Anal Escapades and Gay Adventures...Where is the Democatic leadership exemplified by towering Democratic giants, the likes of JFK and RFK??? Nancy Pelosi and Ted Kennedy, that's the Dems best and brightest..."Now the refrian should be "God Help America" instead of the tradtional "God Bless America", yep the Dems are against that too...what? "God"!

2006-10-09 11:36:43 · 4 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

Jimmy Carter is old and either trying to deceive the American public or he is delusional. The Democrats are the lowest of the low. Everything is the Bush adminastrations fault in their eyes. Thats their answer to everything. Bush did this Bush did that. Hilary Clintons husband had sexual relations with an aide for Gods sake. She hasnt had much to say about that. In fact ive never heard her comment on it. And Clinton did very little to help us out where we are today. He let Bin Laden go, he caused more damage in the North Korea situation by what he did with that in his presidency. The Dems are just ignorant, hypocrits. They offer no answers and only blame Bush for everything. Politics politics politics, I just cant stand it any more. Its going to be a sad day in America if the Democrats win this election. Wait and see. Bush is atleast trying to do the right thing through constant criticism and little support from his "fellow" Americans who would rather chose to call him an idiot rather than offer help and support.

2006-10-11 13:21:37 · answer #1 · answered by Bucfan 2 · 1 1

They're answer: Bash Bush all they can so they can get conservatives to stay home and win 2006. Then the dems will try to get the UN involved (and anyone with half a brain knows that won't work) while saying the military is not an option (yes it is). So the dems have no real answer except for the UN which is a waste of time. Honestly, did you expect BJ Clinton's wife (those are his initials: Bill Jefferson Clinton or BJ Clinton) to do anything short but blame this all on Bush and not accept that her husband is at fault? After they made "the deal" NK turned around and flipped us the bird. After that, he had 6-7 years to deal NK and did he? Absolutely not.

2006-10-09 11:48:20 · answer #2 · answered by nighthawk_842003 6 · 2 0

Jimmy Carter was president over 25 years ago. Meanwhile the Republicans have held the presidency and congress for most of the time since.

You want to blame Carter and Clinton for North Korea going nuclear, yet Rumsfeld sat on the board of the directors of ABB, the company that gave North Korea 2 light water nuclear reactors. Hey they already have graphite reactors provided by the USSR but whatever.

Who's policy was it in Afghanistan that produced the Taliban? Who's policy was it that has failed to put the Taliban down since 9/11?

Now, lets stop trying to blame each other for these problems and lets find a solution to this mess together. United we Stand, Divided we Fall.

2006-10-09 11:50:20 · answer #3 · answered by professional student 4 · 1 2

nicely if I bear in mind appropriate he's in his ninety's...i do no longer assume him to be as sharp as he replaced into even a pair of years in the past. i think of he's familiar with it, and that i could desire he starts off understanding that it is alright to take a step back...he has finished lots already. concentration on Habitat for Humanity and permit our modern leaders shelter international talks.

2016-10-16 00:36:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers