Korea doesn't have anything we want.
2006-10-09 11:38:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush knew that Iraq was totally safe, and he wouldn't have a problem with them. America only goes for easy targets - like Vietnam, which ironically didn't turn out to be so easy after all! America could bully these countries, but North Korea are different because Bush knew that they had heavy-duty weapons - about a year ago the North Koreans told America that if they tried to invade, they would launch their weapons. Bush is incredibly stupid, but he's not yet stupid enough to call their bluff and possibly force them to fire a nuclear weapon! Of course the U.S. is just a bully. It's safer and easier to fight against smaller, less advanced countries. Although look how easy Vietnam and Iraq have been for them! Both those wars are disasters for the U.S. What would happen if they had to fight against a country that was able to properly fight back? They'd be in big trouble! And then we'd have a nuclear war and the whole planet would be in trouble!
2006-10-09 11:37:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by John P 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is the U.S. really just a bully? Well, it does sort of seem like this is how it is at times. I'm thinking the whole WMD thing was just a smokescreen that gave the Bush Administration an excuse to go into Iraq. Don't kid yourself, our economy depends on oil.
But I think God has a more important reason for us being in the Middle East: ISRAEL. In the last days, the clashes between the forces of good and evil will center in this region of the world and many nations will team up against little Israel, chief of them will be Russia.
"God says when Russia comes down, there will be no deliverance for the nation Israel. Don't you know even today if Russia should move against her-- unless America or some other nation would intervene-- there would be no hope for that little nation? It would be absolutely exterminated. Israel would disapear from off the face of the earth. But God says that cannot happen because He will move in Israel's behalf." * (p. 193)
"And Armageddon is the consummation of that rebellion. Christ's return to the earth brings it to a conclusion. We have lost the sense or there being a struggle going on in the world today. However, the pitched battle between light and darkness, between right and wrong, between God and Satan, between that which is good and right and that which is evil and wrong will culminate in this tremendous War of Armageddon."* (p. 210)
"For we are not contending against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places." (Ephesians 6:12)**
2006-10-09 12:50:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by soulguy85 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
on the time, the practise replaced into very attainable. Many politicians, industry leaders, and generic individuals supported entering into Iraq. only using fact the conflict has long previous so off purpose and all human beings has jumped off the bandwagon does not recommend that the strikes did not have help on the time. individuals have been offended, Saddam Hussein replaced into an insane maniac, and on the time Bush's approval score replaced into somewhat intense. Lies have been informed, yet hi, this is politics and it occurs. What human beings ought to do is stop whining and pointing hands over what human beings mentioned, did, or believed in the previous and use what they understand now to be sure that justice in conflict-torn components would be made a fact. have faith it or not, going onto the information superhighway and attempting to insult human beings with a view to make your self look superior only places others on the offensive and destroys efforts to circulate forward. Have a advantageous day!
2016-10-19 02:41:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by shine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love it when people say "Perhaps Iraq hid their weapons." There's no evidence of that. It's just wishful thinking.
However, there is evidence that any and every chemical and biological weapon Iraq had was destoryed during the Gulf War in 1991.
People that believe Iraq had WMDs must also believe that Bush actually cares about the fate of the United States. Two cases of wishful thinking. Bush only cares about money and power.
2006-10-09 13:15:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i will tell you why. its a simple number game most of our troops are tied up in iraq if you remember before the war he said the axis of evil which was iran iraq and korea north that is....well i guess old dubya thought he could just mosey on through iraq put in a ranch where he could take more vacations pluss get more oil for ole pappy to use...then low and behold iraq was more then he could chew on so no troops equals no war with iraq....but i am not an expert....
2006-10-09 11:31:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by ctosnstenftenagel 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
not the US but Bush is ... Bush was upset with Sudam so we attacked Iraq ... N Korea have dared us to attack yet we haven't ... remember we attacked Iraq but can't find Ben Laden ... Bush ran and hid when we were attacked on 9-11
like the chicken he is .... most bullies are
2006-10-09 11:40:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by ladyqueenbeeee 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US had credible evidence that WMDs were in the works for us through the conspiracy of countries including N Korea, Syria, and Iran, as well as Iraq, and certainly none of them would have shed any tears to see us nuked. Got to start somewhere!
Perhaps the Iraq WMDs were moved during the two months notice they had that we were coming to inspect?? Hmmmmm?
2006-10-09 11:29:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by All hat 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
to protect his oil he has stocks in oil an has his own oil fields thats the only reason where over there where not stupid like the bushes are lol bushy thinks that all people are dumb but where not *** dumb as he is lmao
2006-10-09 11:30:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by nights_an_whitesatin 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
because he knows the north koreans are no ragtag army, we could not whip them 50 years ago, and if anybody thinks we can whip them now, I'd say keep on dreaming
2006-10-09 20:05:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by acid tongue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋