Lets say your to-do list includes 30 things. With 30 people do accomplish it for you, how long will it take? How about with 2 people? You'd figure it would take 15x longer when 1 person has to do 15 things instead of having one person do one thing.
Of course, having 2 people do the same thing is a waste and sometimes not possible - have you ever tried to have two people wash dishes at the same time in the same sink? (I don't mean one wash one dry, I mean BOTH washing at the same time?) So if your computer only does one thing, then there is no benefit.
2006-10-09 11:05:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by lwcomputing 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
basically, more processing power. If you have 2 CPUs (instead of the usual 1), those 2 CPUs can split the tasks your computer has to do, giving you more processing power to take care of large, processor-intensive tasks from the programs you use. Basically, its the same as saying that two heads are better than one.
2006-10-09 18:00:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by sfgfan10 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's the advantage to having, say, 30 brains versus just one or two?
Ever hear of "two heads are better than one"?
2006-10-09 17:59:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ken G 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you connect them properly so that they work together you have 30 times a much processing power that you would have with a single CPU.
2006-10-15 12:08:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pingi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The guy is right its like 30 brains Vs. 1 so yea.
2006-10-14 12:51:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dejan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It helps you because you can sell 29 CPU's and still use your Computer.
2006-10-09 18:03:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by ɹɐzɔ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
ok advantage
2006-10-09 18:06:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by matt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋