2006-10-09 10:41:00 · 12 answers · asked by steven r 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I see no problem with that ! Get rid of the homeless and world starvation. How could one argue with that ! We could throw a few others into the equation, happy days,
2006-10-09 12:24:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sounds like a soylent green scenario. Feeding all the non productive people to the rest of the world. This is harsh but a possibility, as you can only farm so many food resources.
2006-10-10 07:29:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
feeding the poor, the homeless and unemployed is a futile effort. our public/ social welfare system has got them addicted to the dole. making them productive, to find their own means to feeding themselves is what is needed.
feeding them to third world, or feeding them at all will never solve the problem.
thanx
2006-10-09 20:14:09 · answer #3 · answered by samuel hugo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not get the homeless to go to wherever all the illegals come from?
2006-10-15 15:28:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. it is to ship off all the free-loading immigrants anywhere else other than here, and provide our native population in difficulty with some aid.
2006-10-09 19:42:15 · answer #5 · answered by alfie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Still living at home with Mommy & Daddy !
2006-10-09 17:45:14 · answer #6 · answered by bulabate 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Might need a little tweaking, but it could work.
2006-10-09 17:45:29 · answer #7 · answered by Moorglademover 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and it would increase our GNP, and lower our trade deficit.
It would make more jobs.
What a great question.
Thank you.
2006-10-09 17:47:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
only if they take the big tissue i mean issue with them?
2006-10-09 17:51:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
next step holocaust
2006-10-09 17:50:03 · answer #10 · answered by no1deaatall 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋