Honest answers!!!?

Question

How many pro Bush and pro-war in Iraq people dare admit now they were wrong

Answer 1

Admitting to being wrong is difficult for most, luckily however us Bush supportors don't have to worry about that. Its you crazy liberals who do. Not invading Iraq? What about 9-11 how can we let a travesty like that go in vain? Payback is sweet, even if the country we invaded had no relationship to it, aren't they all close enough? Besides, Iraq has more oil so they're a more valuble resource. You liberals would have suggested taking UN sanctions, or something reasonable but i say nay. Killing thousands of our youth in America and hundreds of thousands of innocent, civilians in Iraq is the only way to prove that we, the U S of A is the best. Which, of course, we are.

Long Live Bush. Let's Amend the Constitution and Instate him "President" until he dies and take away the legislative and judiciaries powers because they will only limit his awsomeness. Also, once he does die, we should go by heredetary rule because no other blood is even one third as holy.

Answer 2

I won't admit it should not have been done. But I will admit it could have been done better. Actually there has been allot of good things happen in Iraq as well. Schools, stock market, infrastructure improvements, etc. I have a friend that is stationed over there right now. He said that the majority of Iraqi's are not against the U.S. being there. The problem they have is the fact that the violence is directly related to the fact that we ARE there. The insurgents are from what he said 90% Saudi and Syrian. Another problem we have here is the fact that the media only shows the bad and not the good. For example on the news hear you will hear of 2 soldiers killed in a firefight while the media will not say that 50 insurgents were killed at the same time. I am not condoning the problems we have had since 2002, I am only stating there has been improvements in allot of ways. I am in no way condoning Bush either. I think we would have been better off backing the Kurds and other organizations within Iraq to topple Hussein. That would have given them a better national feeling of independence and purpose.

Answer 3

Not likely they will hench the "label" pro-Bush and pro-war.

Right and wrong is a matter of time and hindsight. What is percieved as wrong now maybe right in 20 years. For example, people may have thought it wrong for Reagaon to out-spend the Russians in the 80's but all that spending accelerated the demise of the Soviet Union. Why? They were spending a much larger percentage of their GDP than the US was to keep up. Eventually they collapsed under their own weight of spending and dissatisfaction with their own gov. oh, and getting good with Gorby helped too.

I still think going into Iraq was wrong. But in 10 years maybe it will have been worth it-- I doubt it though.

Answer 4

wrong? no.
maybe without all the anti bush hoopla and pussyfooting for over a year in the UN the war in Iraq would have been over.
But then, do you seriously suggest the US should have done something UNILATERAL to North Korea? I already can see Dems getting the vapours in the senate, and Ted Kennedy swooned...
Short of nuking them here and now- do you really think anything will work? Or must we wait till they send one over to the US- on a passenger plane or cargo ship?
After all, remember the US and North Korea are still technically at war.

Answer 5

Saddam was captured and taken into custody after years of torturing and killing innocent people. As far as I'm concerned, that was a victory in itself, so I'll never feel like this war was wrong, and I'll continue to support President Bush.

Answer 6

properly!!!!!!!!!!! In technical Q, i've got not got any seize 22 difficulty of choosing it.. i will opt for the appropriate or answer extra closer to the particularly answer (if no one is genuine!!) using fact the excellent. additionally, if some individual make humorous comments with suitable solutions, they are going to be the 1st selection. Else, First come First serve.. In different Questions, I suely have the seize 22 difficulty. some cases, my Q could have been replied by making use of only approximately maximum of my generic contacts . i will in an incredible heck!! i will provide BA to a pair one else who has given close to suited answer!! And if i'm in a miles better seize 22 difficulty, i will opt for BA by making use of Thumbs UP!!

Answer 7

Not me, in the long run the region will finally get better after decades of being in chaos.

The war is the only thing Bush is doing right in my opinion.

I'm mad that he is further spending into debt when he has way more revenue than clinton did. Republicans are supposed to have less government spending. We need Newt or Steve Forbes.

Answer 8

300,000+ people were tortured and slaughtered during Saddam's rule and dumped in 40+ different mass grave sites around the country. This included tens of thousands of women and children.

As one that PERSONALLY saw the lifeless bodies of children that were obviously clutching to their mothers as they were burried alive, I cannot understand whom would not want to remove such an evil person as Saddam.

If one thinks that the worth of a child...even though overseas...is of less worth....well, I have nothing more to say to that person. As for me....I'll willingly die so that the innocent life of a child can live....anyday...anywhere...any country.

They deserved better. They deserved the opportunity at life.

If others lack that conviction and courage to save the innocent, they're far beneath me as far as I'm concerned.

Answer 9

I have a better question: How many Iraqis do you think would actually prefer to still be living under Saddam's regime, especially women and the Kurdish? Let's at least wait until his trial is over and his own people decide what to do with him before we begin the hindsight speculation as to whether or not the US occupation is right!

Answer 10

About what? WMD's or no Iraq will be better off withou Saddam if the new government takes hold.