I think "Crash" deserved this award as best picture. People argue that it didjnt deserve it because it was made on such a small budget but what i think is a movie is a movie no matter how u slice and dice it! lol I mean look at the movie Clerks. It was SOOO low budget but it is a classic comedy movie that everyone knows compared to movies on a higher budget that never leave a mark. Crash was one of the most well made movies is what i think. what do u think?
2006-10-09 09:31:32 · 4 answers · asked by deanda 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Movies should be judged on the performances of the actors, and the quality of the film overall......NOT by how much they spent making the film. A lot of great films were made on a low budget, and that doesn't make them any less worthy of watching. I say it won because it deserved to win, not because someone thought it had a big name star in it or because it was a big budget film. Even if it was a lower budget film....who cares? It rightly deserved to win the Oscar!
2006-10-09 09:41:32 · answer #1 · answered by Scotty 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only people who thought Crash shouldn't have one were the gays who wanted brokeback to win. Brokeback was not that great of a movie, the story was boring, the acting was so-so, it was just about gay themes so they think it should've won.
Crash was a well done well acted movie with and interesting story line(s). Good choice.
2006-10-09 16:40:49 · answer #2 · answered by Fire_God_69 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i tried to watch Crash 3 times and could never get thru it. i really did not enjoy it. However, i did like Brokeback Mountain, i found it to be moving and very well done... beautifully filmed too. Also liked Capote but i dont think that was nominated for Best Picture.
2006-10-09 16:45:49 · answer #3 · answered by cynner942000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i EXTREMELY loved Crash
2006-10-09 16:39:41 · answer #4 · answered by strwrs7772000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋