2006-10-09 08:49:30 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Not much, he'd prefer to sit off at home instead of throwing logs around. Unless he was a scottish wood chuck of course.
2006-10-09 08:55:00 · answer #1 · answered by Rachie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Due to new European laws from Brussels it is now outlawed for a woodchuck to chuck wood as there is a risk of splinters having someone's eyes out.
So the question is not if a woodchuck could chuck wood but should a woodchuck chuck wood?
The answer therefore is simple.
None.
2006-10-11 11:07:28 · answer #2 · answered by andrew w 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I once looked up wood chuck in the dictionary, it's another name for the chipmunk.
So it's a small animal with tiny little paws. It would chuck only smallish pieces of wood, but I would imagine it's quite strong because of all that leaping around and tree climbing so it could chuck wood for a fairly long time
my answer is, quite a large number of small pieces
2006-10-09 17:31:06 · answer #3 · answered by used to live in Wales 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know how much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood!
2006-10-10 10:08:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
2006-10-09 16:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by prosthetiichead 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just for the record, a woodchuck is not a beaver or a chipmunk. It's a medium-size mammal, almost as large as a beaver, also known as "groundhog". Woodchucks don't chuck wood. Beavers do. And sometimes professional baseball players.
2006-10-09 17:38:47 · answer #6 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
woodchucks dont chuck wood at all, there not beavers and they dont do anything to trees. the only reason its called a "woodchuck" is because the name the original american natives called it something sounding similar to "wudcuk" and to the english it became "woodchuck"
2006-10-09 16:16:57 · answer #7 · answered by Christian M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A woodchuck is a beaver. Hope that helps.
2006-10-09 15:51:51 · answer #8 · answered by bequalming 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
chucking loads...
2006-10-10 16:37:59 · answer #9 · answered by frankiethebear2002 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You weren't really expecting a sensible answer to this was you ? Hmmm
2006-10-09 15:57:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋