With Foley and Bob Woodward book will the Republicans pull a silver bullet before the elections?
2006-10-09 07:57:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't trust Rove and the dirty tricks machine any further than I can throw them. Remember the Swift Boat liars? How about when they accused Mccain of having an illegitimate child with a black woman?
2006-10-09 08:03:11 · answer #1 · answered by notme 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They were wagging the Korean dog even before the so called "nuke test"; FOX (fake) News was all over Korea last week even though every other news outlet was all Foley and Woodward. Soon we'll be sending ships there if the Republican free fall doesn't stop. Bush and his cronies are desperate, not to protect us but to hold onto power. If they lose the House, they know there's a good chance that a bunch of them are going to end up in the BIG HOUSE.
2006-10-09 11:45:13 · answer #2 · answered by key2x4y 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I choose i ought to assert an unequivocal confident, by way of fact I do so get excitement from nailing Bush's (and Cheney's) cover to the wall. in spite of if, the respond is frequently no. Kim Jong IL is a touch paranoid little (short) guy who these days suffered a stroke/heart attack that became leaked to outdoors press. Speculations to in spite of if the N. Korean chief became "reliable adequate to steer", in all danger, contributed to his maximum contemporary defiance and seeming aggression. experts on the region say he does prefer to "roar" each and every now and then to stay suitable on the international point and seem reliable to the international and to his human beings. while President Obama reported a willingness to talk, Kim Jong IL permit or not it is widespread by using a third social gathering (Japan's chief, some say) that he may be prepared if the talks have been held on the UN, so now experts on the region have self belief that he's attempting to income leverage for the bargaining table, so he does not ought to look "hat in hand", so which you should talk, and he needs to look "effective" to maintain face if he tries to have sanctions eased. As President Obama has certain us, there is not something N. Korea can do for which we don't have a contingency plan---this little banty fowl guy is not any danger to us.
2016-11-27 03:00:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has already used up his patriotic fervor card. Americans are getting tired of war (that's not a political statement, just a statement reflecting the most recent opinions polls), and adding another to the list would have the exact opposite effect of helping Republicans to win elections.
The Bush White House is probably trying to figure out what it's going to say when Democrats are saying they ignored the growing threat of North Korea in favor of Iraq. I see this as more of a problem for them than a windfall.
2006-10-09 08:05:27 · answer #4 · answered by Mark 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Foley and woodward democrat silver bullet, missed and didnt do what they wanted, its still a neck to neck race which is funny, mudslinging campaigning and jerry springer politics, its ok for the democrats to do things but republicans cant play the game....not to fair is it...
2006-10-09 08:00:35 · answer #5 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Everything is as sinister as you suspect. Emmigrate now.
2006-10-09 08:12:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has not had any policy since coming into office.
2006-10-09 07:59:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You're funny. The only thing Mistah Butch got up his sleeve ... is Kleenex!
2006-10-09 07:59:20 · answer #8 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO!!!!!!!On the 2nd question: you never know what's going to happen until it happens!!!
2006-10-09 08:08:18 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
how do you put up with such an idiot as a president
2006-10-09 09:31:19 · answer #10 · answered by simon u 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋