Despite calling on the UN, saying that N K's actions were intimidatory, Bush did not accept that a nuclear bomb was tested today. Everybody else in the world has.
Another case of head in sand, you think? Hoping he will wake up and it's just been a bad dream?
2006-10-09 07:49:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
notme, I bow to your knowledgeable statement. I wish more NEOCONS can research their facts like you do.
2006-10-09 08:04:11 · update #1
To someone above - the Light water reactors were never completed. They are simpler and cheaper than heavy water reactors, and although they have the same power-generating capabilities, it is far more difficult to use them to produce weapons-grade plutonium, as the reactor must be shut down and the fuel rods replaced every four months because if they stay in any longer, the plutonium-240 concentration will become too high and poison the plutonium-239. A disadvantage of light water reactors is that they must use enriched uranium, while heavy water reactors can use natural uranium.
2006-10-09 07:59:30 · answer #1 · answered by notme 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush has typically been cautious with scientific subject mater.
Asking for proof adds to the brinkmanship taunting NK into testing another Nuke. I like the idea of provoking NK because I am pro war pro annihilation.
Someone said yesterday unless we help Iran and Korea build Nukes How will we ever have an Armageddon
Go big Red Go
2006-10-09 15:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
because if he states it was a nuke and turns out it wasn't one the jackass liberals will have a field day , these liberals are out to hurt America obviously , and he doesn't want to give them a hand . although everyone knows the liberals make no sense and aren't productive members of society , but there are some weak minded liberal wannabes out there that might be convinced of their complete BS , and it is election season
i find it amazing how you found something to whine about , your imagination should be studied and taught to future civilizations so we know how to spot a retarded liberal
2006-10-09 14:58:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Makes him look bad (ahahaa).
Too late.
This has NOT been a good 30 days for the party of irresponsibility and deficits.
2006-10-09 14:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because they can also explode a Diesel -Ammonium Nitrate device to scare others.It happens many time in Politics.
2006-10-09 15:09:43 · answer #5 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They are afraid of starting another unnecessary fiasco like they did in Iraq. They want to make SURE there is a weapon of mass destruction this time.
2006-10-09 14:54:01 · answer #6 · answered by courage 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Whats wrong with wanting proof? Especially considering North Korea is a desperate country and the whole thing could be just another attention getter.
2006-10-09 14:52:13 · answer #7 · answered by Judge Dredd 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
was it produced in the lightwater reactors that the dems gave them in the 90's?
Why did the dems arm the axis of evil in the 90's?
google "gore chernomyrdin act", gore let russia give Iran nuclear reactors and a ten year supply of uranium back in 96. along with kilo class subs and su-27 fighters.
so ...
Why did the dems arm the axis of evil in the 90's?
Is this why no one trusts Dems with National Security anymore?
well, if only Clinton had given alqaeda nuclear reactors......
2006-10-09 14:51:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
I think they are waiting for actual hard facts prior to making a statement.
2006-10-09 14:51:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
So you there to see it! Would you bet your life that it did go off
2006-10-09 14:55:07 · answer #10 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋