Because everything is Bill Clinton's fault! And Mark Foley's desire for teen boys is Bill Clinton's fault! And global warming is Bill Clinton's fault! Because Bill Clinton gave America something to be proud of instead of trying to make us all scared. That's why the world used to like America. Now that everyone hates us because of Bush we must be safer! Clinton is the root of all evil! That's why we are better off now that our country is run by fools!
2006-10-09 07:31:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mark 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
... he trusted North Korea. And because he didn't negotiate a system of checks into his agreement with them. Meanwhile, Bush has been insisting on the six-party talks for which liberals begged regarding Iraq.
As far as Foley, I'd say that if the Democrats had a coherent strategy and had been more focused on moving our country forward than tearing it apart with hateful ideology since 2000, it's possible they could 've capitalized on the sagging poll numbers of Bush and the GOP by now and won some seats back in both the House and the Senate. Had that been the case, not only MIGHT Foley have been overcome by a Democratic opponent, but the Dem majority in charge would have been chomping at the bit to take down a Republican House member.
2006-10-09 14:47:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lawn Jockey 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you want to blame Clinton how about the fact the he cut military spending in half during his administration while using more bombs than every president combined since WWII together (without replenishing the bomb stock). Part of the reason Bush has had a larger deficit than Clinton is replenishing the missiles that Clinton used.
How about that Clinton gave China our submarine technology, & nuclear technology making a lot of this situation depend on China's decision instead of being capable of disarming N. Korea without seeking their strongest allies approval first.
If you want to talk about Foley, would you also like to talk about Gerry Studds having sex with a male page in 1983? The difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is that when a Republican is exposed in a scandal he is not re-elected while Democrats are not corned with "family values".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Studds#Congressional_page_sex_scandal
For the record I do not blame Clinton for N. Korea. I just think it is funny that liberals will bad mouth Bush for not having a stronger response to N. Korea and then when he orders the troops to go in, liberals will complain that our foreign policy is out of line and it is none of our business.
2006-10-09 14:41:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dano 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Under a 1994 deal negotiated by the Clinton administration provided to North korea lightwater nuclear reactors and they had the capacity to generate enough nuclear fuel to produce almost 100 nuclear bombs per year,
this was put out by a 1999 congressional study
that gave the Clinton administration warning about it.
The Democratic Party knew about the Foley emails for 3 years and did nothing about them.
2006-10-09 14:58:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Uh oh I was going to tell you about the 1994 deal Clinton had with North Korea and how it gave them enough "stuff" to make about 100 nukes a year but others have already beat me to it. But will this change your mind about how great you think Clinton was? No. Some great answers here anything else you want to know about your hero just ask. And as far as perverts in politics there are a few on both sides of the isle and even one is way too many. And for the far left leaders of the Democratic party to all of a sudden grow morals on this subject gives the name hypocrite a whole new meaning.
2006-10-09 14:37:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Let's see how you like a Republican speaking reality to you.
North Korea's nuke test was North Korea's fault. Every president does the best they can while in office and it is useless to blame them for short-comings. Every president has to do their job with both arms tied behind their backs by the congress fighting over which parties wang is bigger. Such is the state of American politics, both parties are at fault.
Again, Foley, like both dem and republicans condemned for the same thing in the 80's, is responsible to only himself for his actions.
Now, can we quit throwing stones and silly thoughts around and start answering serious questions posed to this nation as one instead of segregating ourselves and accomplishing nothing?
2006-10-09 14:35:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by r_k_winters 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
First part of the question is that Clinton failed to put pressure on N. Korea. Instead of putting sanctions on them he tried to pay them off. Just like he tried to take the easy way in Somalia and ended up getting our men massacred. AS for the Foley thing perhaps he thought Bush would pardon him like Clinton did to the pervert that had sex with a teenager. After the dear old dummcratic party censured him they got Clinton to pardon him so he could run for office again and serve two more terms. Lets not forget that great drinking pair of Kennedy's the dummycrats love so much or the fag Barney Frank that just brightens up their day. By the way it was Clinton that gave the Chinese the satellite technology so they could build better missiles :>)
2006-10-09 14:36:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by mr conservative 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Clinton gave the North Koreans a nuclear reactor. What else needs to be said?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/02/10/nkorea.timeline/index.html
2006-10-10 15:29:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cowdemon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've been looking into this, and Clinton agreed to allow two light water nuke plants for peaceful purposes if NK agreed to inspections. These plants were never completed because of later charges of appeasement by congress/bush who blocked it. This upset Kim Jong ll the megalomaniac toad brain, and he resumed a nuke weapon program that resulted in the test yesterday. It must be understood there is no connection between the light water plants and the test. NK had other reactors and other sources of bomb grade material that were earlier supplied by Russia and China - with crucial help from Pakistan on the bomb technology. Blaming Clinton makes no sense. Korea has no oil of it's own and nuclear power is one of the few options they have. It makes far more sense to blame the congress/bush for stopping clintons deal, and Bush for calling NK part of the Axis of Evil, and refusing to negotiate in good faith. Kim Jong ll is pissed because he signed deals which Bush over-rode, and Bush has done nearly zero negotiating to try and fix the problem, making Kim even more angry. Thanks George, you've done it again.
2006-10-09 14:33:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by notme 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
...he had his nuke in Monica's silo.
The Democrats are clearly to blame for the Foley thing because he heard from them it was normal to be gay. He was surrounded by fat and ugly Democrat politicians and teenagers. He figured the teenagers were a better shot since the Democrats had so much coming out their azz. He decided to try the gay thing based on their position, and asked the pages to assume the position.
2006-10-09 14:31:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
2⤊
1⤋