After all, it took the Foley problem off of the front page.
2006-10-09 07:22:30 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It appears to me that most of you need to look up the definition of "irony" and "sarcasm".
2006-10-09 08:48:05 · update #1
I got it! It made me laugh very hard. Can I have best answer?
2006-10-09 11:13:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say that North Korea, Iran and many others were convinced to either start or step-up their development of nuclear energy programs when the low mental-energy of the republican hierarchy showed them what they'll do to countries without nuclear power. Using Iraq as an example.
2006-10-09 07:46:25 · answer #2 · answered by Ray W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Acually Foley is STILL there. Dumbya is an idiot-savant. Some savants play piano, some do remarkable calculations, and Dumbya's talent is EVIL in which he is unsurpassed. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-10-09 07:39:18 · answer #3 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well they did give N korea the Bomb after all, it was just a matter of time before Kim checked to see if it really was Nuclear
2006-10-09 07:26:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This goes way back before Foley and the President cannot be blamed for what Clinton allowed
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/772130/posts
2006-10-09 07:33:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Temporarily
2006-10-09 07:24:09 · answer #6 · answered by courage 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No one disputes Rove's intelligence. Many believe he is the puppetmaster controlling Bush.
2006-10-09 07:24:32 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I could picture the GOP all high fiving each other when I saw the news alert.
Do you think they all have "I heart Kim Jong Il" bumper stickers?
2006-10-09 07:24:56 · answer #8 · answered by misskate12001 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Foley's on another page? Haven't they stopped him yet?
2006-10-09 07:25:34 · answer #9 · answered by notme 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
This is WAAAAYYYYY too complicated a question for the moronic Weak Sisters on this "forum".
Acknowledging their logical inconsistencies is not their stong suit.
2006-10-09 07:25:02 · answer #10 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋