First, most of my views are liberal, so I am asking all of you whom are fair minded and intelligent to not fallaciously go around labelling me as a conservative or fascist based on the following question. I know most of you are plenty intelligent to know better.
Now to my question. Do you feel that some among you use an adversariel position on Bush too much as a rationalization for the behavior of the Iranian and North Korean governments? Or do you feel their behavior is justifiable, even warranted? If your views are nuanced, please express them. I ask this because it does seem to me that some of the criticisms against Bush are starting to obfuscate the issue of how to deal with Iran and North Korea.
Please give your thoughts. Thanks.
2006-10-09 07:07:58 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
iran and north korea are looking at the facts ... the US seeks to dominate the middle east and bring any govt that is not inline with their policies into subjection... by force if necessary. And its not "Bush" that is setting military doctrine and policy ... its part of a much larger plan and doctrine that we have seen at work for the past couple of decades ... well, the american people have been brainwashed into ignoring it, but other countries and govts see it for what it is ... a plan for "pax-americana" ... a plan to secure americas dominance both militarily and economically into the new mellinium. So, its not about whether or not it is justified and that depends on who you are really ... the entire middle east will be secured and brought in line with US policy first and we will control 70% of the world oil and be in the most strategic location on earth for the coming confrontation with China ... its not about the nuclear issue in reality, China is already a major nuclear threat, iran will be subjugated as part of US middle east policy and cannot be allowed to become nuclear before that plan is finished ... north korea is a possible destabilization force in a region we dont want to deal with just yet .. so look for nothing more than sanctions to keep them on a short leash and possibly causing China to act to reign them in .... the critisisms against bush are misplaced really, hes just the mouthpiece for those that are actually running the show and you can bet that the next administration will be serving the same goals of american domination in the middle east and bolstering our position against a strengthening China ...everything else is side issues stemming off of those main objectives.
2006-10-09 07:27:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Negotiation is step one. The UN must be dealing with this. Our administration ought to shop their mouths close and enable the UN safeguard it. Then - if particularly tension is critical - the UN ought to do it. this is time for the US to take a partial step decrease back and enable the UN do it is job. regrettably, the united states of a now has the popularity of the aggressor. The "physique of recommendations" - from Mr. Bush - my way or no way. Our foreign places coverage is definitely at a low factor. We went to conflict on lies. Too many international locations understand that the US knew the justifications have been lies and Bush did what he needed to besides. we actually look undesirable for that. For the united states of a to offer the two us of a an ultimatum - is thoroughly incorrect. Make the UN do it precise. we will get dragged into it quickly sufficient.
2016-10-19 02:19:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
while Iran is not threatening anyone in the world and countries are still in negotiations, North Korea is a threat, the world community HAS to do something about North Korea or one day we'll be missing some countires
2006-10-09 07:16:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My answer is simple. REPUBLICANS HATE AMERICA
2006-10-09 07:11:11 · answer #4 · answered by ast5792 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋