Aww cripes people, didn't anyone study math in school?? Okay, so , this is a pretty simple math problem, taken in an "ideal"/"theoretical" way. This will be a really simple and really exaggerated example. Basically most people had it right you can only fold things until they're as thick as they are wide approximately... (Just trying it I couldn't get more than 6 folds on a paper appx 4 inches by 8 inches, by well as thin as a piece of paper, maybe a 1/16 of a millimeter?) So, let's just take the dimensions of a square of paper to make the math simpler: We'll assume the paper is appx 1000 millimeters long by 1000 milimeters wide, by 1/16 of a milimeter high (3 dimensions). Each time you fold a paper in half, one of the dimensions stays the same, another doubles and another is halved. With one fold along the vertical line between the two parallel sides of the paper (we'll use looking at it from above as the vantage point) we get the width halved, the length stay the same and the height doubles (Width=500, length=1000, height = 1/8). Now, we'll try folding it again, this time along the horizontal axis (then vertical, horizontal, vertical horizontal ...). The new dimensions are: Fold 2: width = 500, length = 500, height = 1/4 Fold 3: width = 250, length = 500, height = 1/2 Fold 4: width = 250, length = 250, height = 1 Fold 5: width = 125, length = 250, height = 2 Fold 6: width = 125, length = 125, height = 4 Fold 7: width = 62.5, length = 125, height = 8 Fold 8: width = 62.5, length = 62.5, height = 16 Fold 9: width = 31.25, length = 62.5, height = 32 So basically you're halving one dimension while doubling another with each fold. Eventually you get to a point where you'd have to double one to greater than the half of the other, and it just doesn't work. And that's not taking into account the physics of trying to actually fold a paper. It doesn't fold cleanly, the edge warps with each fold making it increasingly more difficult with each fold. So, if we take a regular piece of paper, we get 8.5in (216mm) x 11in (279mm) x 1/16mm {maybe more; just guesstimating since I can't find an actual measure of the thickness online, if it's thicker, the unfoldable point comes sooner.} Fold 1: Width = 216, length = 139.5, height = 1/8 Fold 2: Width = 108, length = 139.5, height = 1/4 Fold 3: Width = 108, length = 69.75, height = 1/2 Fold 4: Width = 54, length = 69.75, height = 1 Fold 5: Width = 54, length = 34.875, height = 2 Fold 6: Width = 27, length = 34.875, height = 4 Fold 7: Width = 27, length = 17.4375, height = 8 Fold 8: Width = 13.5, length = 17.4375, height = 16 Fold 9: Width = 13.5, length = 8.71875, height = 32 So we see that around fold 7-8 it becomes nigh impossible to fold anymore (maybe fold 6-7 or 5-6 if we're talking heavy weight paper). Even with extremely long thin strips of paper you'll eventually hit a limit of how many halvings and doublings you can do. Heck, let's figure out how a long thin ribbon of paper would fold... Let's say it's 10,000,000 millimeters long, 1000 milimeters wide, and 1/16 of a millimeter thick: Fold 1: Width = 1000, length = 5,000,000, height = 1/8 Fold 2: Width = 1000, length = 2,500,000, height = 1/4 Fold 3: Width = 1000, length = 1,250,000, height = 1/2 Fold 4: Width = 1000, length = 625,000, height = 1 Fold 5: Width = 1000, length = 312,500, height = 2 Fold 6: Width = 1000, length = 156,250, height = 4 Fold 7: Width = 1000, length = 78,125, height = 8 Fold 8: Width = 1000, length = 39,062.50, height = 16 Fold 9: Width = 1000, length = 19,531.25, height = 32 Fold 10: Width = 1000, length = 9,765.625, height = 64 Fold 11: Width = 1000, length = 4882.8125, height = 128 Fold 12: Width = 1000, length = 2441.40625, height = 256 Fold 13: Width = 1000, length = 1220.703125, height = 512 Fold 14: Width = 1000, length = 610.3515625, height = 1024 For this width to length to height ration I'd guess somewhere around fold 10-13 it'll become unfoldable. But for the "regular paper" IE US Letter size, the middle results above say somewhere around 6-8 folds will do it, depending on the thickness of the original paper. Maybe if you had something ultimately thin and ultimately strong (thinner than a hair, stronger than stell and more flexible than rubber; not likely) you could get up to 8, but it's doubtful...
2016-03-17 04:23:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋