English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Read this and tell me if you care.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6033407.stm
I should add that the BBC is an independent news medium that is not controlled by corporate or government interests, and can therefore be relied upon to be relatively neutral in its reporting.

2006-10-09 06:46:16 · 1 answers · asked by The Gadfly 5 in News & Events Current Events

Intracirc..:Thanks for your answer. I did not ask for a diatribe against the BBC. I did say relatively neutral. It's the best we've got in the English language at any rate.

2006-10-09 07:02:01 · update #1

The queen does not own the BBC and has no say over what it broadcasts.

2006-10-09 07:03:06 · update #2

1 answers

The BBC IS NOT an independent news medium, it is the British Broadcasting Corporation. IT is not bias free, language, cultural medium and meaning of political centrisism differs from place to place, the only true neutral is your state perspective, and that is not necisarily neutral to an outer culture. It wouldn't be news if the value of the event didn't exist for that cultural perspective.

The BBC is a british public corporation and IS NOT nuetral, I suppose you think the Queen of England is neutral too?

Part of the issue is we don't die right away from r-p'n the planet.

Plant some trees, buy a forest and manage it, and don't use technology, grow your own food or die.

Except for what went to space, it is all still here--- it is just what form it is in.

I strongly support sustaining green technologies and enviornmental management.

Part of the issue is that most land is "owned" or claimed by interests that will kill you to stop you from using it, even to "heal
the land"

2006-10-09 06:54:38 · answer #1 · answered by intracircumcordei 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers