Actually, that is in the Bible, believe it or not. Matthew 22:24-31 is a story of men and women that ends with, "For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven." Additionally, Galatians 3:26-28 says in 28, "there is neither male nor female".
If the Bible account is true, in the end our gender is irrelevant, it won't matter.
2006-10-09 06:57:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rabbit 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think this is a little far-fetched. Humans and other animals have had pretty much the same percentage of gender-preference differences since we've been keeping track of such things. Additionally, changes in preferences certainly don't indicate changes in anatomy. I mean, if penis size had been steadily shrinking, THAT may be a sign of changing physiognomy or "evolution." But the mere higher visibility of homosexuals really doesn't indicate any sort of trend.
2006-10-09 13:47:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by CuteWriter 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
If we were all of the same gender who would have the babies, how would you make them.
It is most definitly not a sign of evolution except that we are so troubled about speaking out what is right and wrong that we let the sinners tell us and be in our face about their sexual preference.
Sex is a private thing between a man and a woman but gays like to push it in your face that they are gay and proud of it, it is all very sickening, even if heterosexuals were to do this it would be sickening and instead of evolution you would no longer have a human race but a race that acts like animals, fornicating in public for all to see, no longer keeping human conception a private matter between husband and wife.
2006-10-09 13:50:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Neptune2bsure 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sexual orientation, i.e gay, bisexual, is nothing to do with your gender. So if one day far off in the future we are all of the same gender or more significantly sex, then I really don't think that it will be anythig to do with mankinds ancestors batting for a variety of different teams
2006-10-09 13:49:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by holmegirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, actually if you look at the situations it is becoming apparent that there are things going on that are related to OVERCROWDING issues, not a shift in evolving into one gender.
If you look at some of the examples from other species, some animals spontaneously abort, others will kill their offspring, and that is due in a large part to stress during pregnancy and overcrowding conditions. I still lay my bet on the supposition, that homosexuality is a natural method that is designed to slow population growth while retaining offspring that are needed to make society continue to function.
2006-10-09 13:48:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, that would just suck!!!
No, if there's an evolution in anything here, it's societal openness.
2006-10-09 14:19:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by GreenEyedLilo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nah, asexuality was first, long before duosexuality, and mammals existed.
2006-10-09 13:46:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is possible that pigs will fly but I don't think so. And to be quite frank I hope not as the smell would be atrocious and can you imagine having to clean that off your car.
2006-10-09 13:48:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♂ Randy W. ♂ 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Good question and very interesting. You're a thinker.
2006-10-09 13:48:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by divad 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
How would be reproduce? I don't me we, in the GLBT community, I mean we as in humans?
2006-10-09 13:48:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mark 5
·
0⤊
0⤋