I was surprised at the high turnout of the deceased. Maybe next they'll start demanding rights!
2006-10-09 06:44:10 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
MEL T - "more democrats are involved with fraud." OH SO THAT'S OK THEN
2006-10-09 06:49:13 · update #1
you know, ironically it was the democrats who got whole cemeteries to vote for JFK in Cook County illinois, which led to JFK winning the electoral college votes for illinois and swinging the election to JFK in 1960.
Ironic isnt it. Nixon didnt want a recount because he didnt want to put america through something as ugly as a recount. I guess dems dont care.
on the lighter side of things... democrats overwhelmingly favor the "death tax". when you die, uncle sam (or uncle teddy kennedy) gets a huge chunk of your estate for no good reason (slush funds for uncle teddy). Now, since we fought wars over taxation without representation, and since we tax the dead, should they also have their voices heard? even since dems nail them with a death tax?
Tom, you sound like you went through the public school system
2006-10-09 06:48:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
None, Gearge Bush Jr. Has already been elected the Maximum of two Four Year Terms. Hopefully another More Conservative Republican will be running for those in heaven to vote for
2006-10-09 07:37:49 · answer #2 · answered by James B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not one of the above. The election isn't for yet another 17 months. way too early to assert. it incredibly is not any longer uncomplicated for me to wrap my head around why we are even having this debate now. do you comprehend how plenty the international and the applicants are going to alter interior the subsequent 17 months? Moronic acceptance contest question. i assume i'm going to could track in to CNN to get the respond. jogs my memory of those grade college mock elections.
2016-12-13 05:03:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you have that completely reversed , bush wanted everyone to show their ID when voting to ensure this would not happen , democrats refused for some reason and wants people to walk in with no identification . republicans even offered to pay for the id's of elderly and poor just so we can have a fair election but democrats still didn't agree
2006-10-09 06:50:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The dead demanding rights? There are more of them then of us so I don't think that will work. I think that is one race that the whites could put demands on. We will get about as much as we do demanding for anything else.
2006-10-09 06:47:00 · answer #5 · answered by Itsme 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not too many.. the Democrats in Florida, Ohio and Illinois cornered the market on the deceased voters. (FYI, that is one of the reasons the Republicans are after IDs for voters.)
2006-10-09 06:48:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It depends on how many he keeps sending to the middle east.
Of course he would never fight, but our friends and family can
Than again John Kerry did look like Count Chocula.
I don't think I could vote for the sugary undead either.
2006-10-09 06:46:43 · answer #7 · answered by cosmiccastaway 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You ARE seriously confused - by law the dead must vote for Democrats (see Chicago)!
Any ninny with a sixth-grade education knows this - what IS the matter with you?!?
2006-10-09 06:50:03 · answer #8 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fortunately that idiot cannot run for president again. GWB wants his brother, Jeb to run for president - talk about jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. I'm sure every dead person in Florida & Ohio would vote for him.
2006-10-09 06:49:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey Tom no sources but I will give you some that prove the democrats have many dead voters. According to the research none will vote for republican but all will vote democrat
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060226/METRO/602260301
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/206969_dead07.html
2006-10-09 07:06:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋