2006-10-09 05:56:05 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No.
It's a chosen behavior. They choose to behave in that manner. They have control over what they do or do not do. Excuses change nothing and there is nothing to justify. Why study it?
Better to study how to build a better bomb shelter...we may need it sooner than your "cure".
If you disagree, and Im sure some people do, then explain why people who pride themselves on choice are suddenly helpless when it comes to this particular issue? The average person is capable of a wide array of emotions, each triggered by learned behaviors, so I am not denying they may "feel" something, however the problem is in the act, not the feeling...besides, sex is for procreation, not recreation.
.
2006-10-09 06:09:26 · answer #1 · answered by paradigm_thinker 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't support federal funding for medical research on how to cure gay-ness just so that these queers can find out that homosexuality isn't a genetic defect. Why spend money to cure a " disease" that isn't a disease but an excuse to some perverts sick habits.
2006-10-09 06:03:10 · answer #2 · answered by Eli V 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
A republican congress would never approve something like that because it runs counter to their argument that homosexuality is a choice. If it "needs to be cured" then it's not a choice, is it?
The democrats don't have a hang up about gay people and neither do I so my answer to your question would be no.
2006-10-09 06:02:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, it would be wasted. You can't "cure" homosexuality any more than you can "cure" someone's hair color. I'd spend the money on schools to better educate people so they wouldn't ask questions like this.
2006-10-09 06:01:53 · answer #4 · answered by random6x7 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, but I would support one that cures hate and ignorance.
2006-10-09 05:59:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
The same placebo could be administered to cure your bigotry.
2006-10-09 05:59:02 · answer #6 · answered by dingdong 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
YES
I would be in favor of genetic research and testing.
2006-10-09 06:09:14 · answer #7 · answered by E LIB o NATOR 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nah, there are more important diseases to fix.
Besides, if they did that, who would be the good hairstylists?
2006-10-09 06:02:41 · answer #8 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. We need never to get rid of fashion designers
2006-10-09 06:00:41 · answer #9 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Excuse me, but that's an idiotic question. Being gay is not a disease; not even a contagious disease. So, relax.
2006-10-09 06:01:13 · answer #10 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋