He is the worst president in the history of the united states. WE should impeach him for goodness sakes!!!
2006-10-09 05:36:44 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
retarded is to good of a description. there are some great retarded people in the world. a greedy thief and LIAR would be more like it.
2006-10-09 05:48:54 · answer #1 · answered by cory w 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
These posts get more amusing every time I see them. As if you just keep screaming that Mr. Bush should be impeached that people are suddenly say what was I thinking. Mr. Bush is president because the Democrats were unable to field a candidate the majority of people felt safe voting for. Mr. Bush is neither the best president, nor is he the worst. He is not the most intelligent president, nor is he the most unintelligent. He has not been impeached because no one has provided evidence or provable charges to support an impeachment proceeding. Most Americans do not completely agree, nor completely disagree with Mr. Bush and his policies. These posts ignore one basic reality, you may not like Mr. Bush or the Republicans, but until such as a time as the Democrats present viable candidates and solutions rather than hateful rhetoric the situation is not going to change. There is a lesser of two evils mentality at work in this country and for three elections in a row we have evidence of what the majority considers to be the lesser of those evils. The Democrats can change this, but not as long as they stay mired in the politics of hatred. The people are ready for change, but they want positive change, not just a change of party and more of the same.
2006-10-09 13:11:34 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually I think you are the most retarded person in the world. What does it say about the Democratic party when the best they have to offer is beaten by the most retarded person in the world? TWICE!
It's election year. Don't you think IF the Democrats even thought Bush should be impeached they would be pushing for it long ago? Even if they lost the bid for impeachment, with VALID reasons they would take back the moral highground they lost when they backed Bill's antics.
I hope Democrats at least take back one house of Congress. If they don't do it now they will lose the focus of their motivation in the 2008 elections. Bush can't run again and their chant of vote for me I'm not Bush fails miserably because the Republicans can use the same chant.
Clinton was the one the Democrats should have gone along with and impeached. It would have looked like the Democrats really wanted to clean up their party and become trustworthy again. The Democratic flag would once again flown on the moral high ground.
Clinton couldn't run in 2000. And with Clinton gone Gore runs not as a wannabe but as a sitting President. That alone would have given him anough votes to carry Florida. He still would have lost Tennessee and Arkansas (ever ask yourself why?) but it wouldn't have mattered.
What kind of money do you want to bet even IF Democrats take back both houses they won't impeach Bush? If Democrats don't impeach Bush will you still vote for them in 2008?
2006-10-09 12:55:29 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No. Jimmy Carter was the worst. Clinton wasn't too bad, but I did not like the idea of him being serviced in the Oval Office.
2006-10-09 12:47:37 · answer #4 · answered by Diana 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Thats what happens when you get a person who hasnt worked their way up the public service ranks and qualified themselves by genius...stupid people running the country based on financial and family connections.
USA needs to impeach and get the voting system to be non financial......ie the best/highest 12 public servants get their policies heard and voted upon. people should be necessarily rich to be deemed the best for the job. You have it all *** backwards.
2006-10-09 13:01:25 · answer #5 · answered by Scully 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
And you could do a better job. Doubt it. It is incredibly ignorant of you to say that the most powerful man in the world is also the most "retarded". You must be about 12 years old.
2006-10-09 12:45:18 · answer #6 · answered by only p 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
You put clowns in charge, your gonna get a circus. Bush is the ringmaster in a very,very sinister 3 ringed corporate elite circus. He should never have been allowed to get away with stealing his office.
2006-10-09 12:56:04 · answer #7 · answered by dingdong 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Uh, that would be a tie between Slick Willy and the wacko liberal psychotic Al Gore, with his global warming lies.
2006-10-09 12:47:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I agree 100%! But as you'll see (just by asking this question) people actually support him or have some excuse as to why he is still in office. Its a shame we live in a country full of pu*sy's that won't stand up for themselves and stand up against this unjust government.
2006-10-09 12:41:36 · answer #9 · answered by M eesie 2 · 5⤊ 4⤋
I totally agree. He can't be re elected so he doesn't care about what's going on. He set up twin towers and now with all this war and media hype, it only makes him richer in put the whole U.S. in turmoil.
2006-10-09 12:40:26 · answer #10 · answered by Deavious999 3 · 6⤊ 3⤋