In my opinion it proves that they are an absolute joke. It is 20 minutes long so you may want to bookmark it if you know what I am talking nabout.
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2064011173678536575&q=popular+mechanics+radio+interview
2006-10-09 04:40:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have yet to see any report anywhere explain where the thermite residues and molten steel came from. IF the official version is true, (and even now the commision has admitted that parts of their official report are wrong) , and burning fuel was hot enough to 'weaken' the steel trusses allowing a zipper effect causing a pancake collapse of the towers, ... IF that was true, Where the hell did the thermite residue found in the basements of the towers come from? Burnings desks and carpets, ignited from burning aviation fuel, cannot create thermite residue. Thermite residue WAS discovered. WHY? and HOW did it get there?
2006-10-09 04:58:52 · answer #1 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I never liked the Popular Mechanics magazine... they always seem to have such mundane articles compared to other science publications. It like Spike TV and G4 had a paper baby.
And for MEL_T: real scientists and real engineers tend to DISAGREE on many things... just because a few say its so doesnt neccesarily make it that way.
2006-10-09 04:44:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The 9/11 "truth movement" is the disgrace. Movie makers and gullible watchers vs. actual engineers and mechanics. Not a tough decision, my friend.
2006-10-09 04:44:32 · answer #3 · answered by MEL T 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
it quite is particularly achievable the president did no longer understand relating to the 9/11 attack, yet i've got self belief the folk around him did. too lots went into convincing the those that Iraq had something to do with it. i've got self belief a conflict with Iraq replaced into coming near near in spite of the justifications given, so the folk in his administration had to appreciate something.....
2016-10-16 00:13:15 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the 9/11 truth movement is a disgrace! We all know what happened there is no conspiracy
2006-10-09 04:44:31 · answer #5 · answered by Texan Pete 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
anything that goes agaist the 9/11 attack is a good thing, why do bush get it insured for so muc before the attack 20 million per tower (dutch paper) most people in europe believe it was bush who ordered it
2006-10-09 07:17:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Trying? They have made the 9/11 conspiracy nuts look stupid. Not that anyone needed to make them look stupid.
2006-10-09 04:49:17 · answer #7 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You conspiracy lunatics look stupid even without Popular Mechanics!
2006-10-09 04:51:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
just one more instance of liberals being caught trying to distort the truth so that idiots that follow them can feel like they are intelligent.
2006-10-09 04:44:24 · answer #9 · answered by Proud Republican 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋