Darrel Hair the controvercial Umpire seems to be undermining Asian Cricket fans and players too.Once his attempt to outcast Sri Lankan ace spinner M.Muralitharan and recently an accusation of ball tampering against Pakistan team.Both of his allegations were in vein but the ICC is bias towards this infamous D.Hair.So, the ICC should very soon have a nice Hair Cut if it expects to have gentlemen qualities in future cricket without discriminations.
2006-10-09 04:31:07 · 10 answers · asked by JILMAAL 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
The bottom line is ICC sees him as one of the best umpires in the game, which he probably is. The calls he made against Inzy or Murali, while uncommon, completely followed the rules. In my opinion, I'm surprised more umpires don't do it, but I assume tey just don't have the coconuts.
With Murali he has been cleared, but it took years, so it was obviously not a clear-cut case. Even so, many people around the world still believe he is a chucker. Sure, he's got an elbow problem so he can't straighten his arm properly, but umpires don't take medical history into account when making calls.
Inzy has been cleared of ball tampering on the basis there wasn't enough evidence to prove his guilt. That's not saying he was innocent. It's just saying they don't really know. Hair did exactly what umpires should do in the situation - report the incident (and if the player is innocent, nothing comes of it) and changing the ball, something which is done regularly in cricket. Inzy is the one that made his team forfeit the game and he deserves to be fined for bringing the game into disrepute. That's hardly a gentlemanly quality. Let's face it, if every team forfeited if they thought the umpire was against them, we'd never finish a game.
2006-10-09 06:27:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes i am totally agree with you. He is a baseless umpire i have ever seen. He has made his decisions always aginst Asians, but he made him self popular by making issues of un worthy matters.
However it is shame that ICC is still giving him a chance. If I were a committee in ICC He should be in baseball instead of cricket. Big Shame for ICC!
2006-10-09 05:18:19 · answer #2 · answered by Ozone3 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Considering hair's Oval issue only, I think he hs NOT DONE ANYTHING WRONG. He was only following the rules. The blame has to be taken by the MATCH REFEREE who watched the fiasco from the sidelines like us.
2006-10-09 18:26:39 · answer #3 · answered by SigmaPro 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they wont do it...ICC is soo clever...they have just given him a rst n they will bring him back whn th dust settless...they just forgot his immoral act of demanding some hunders thousand dollars from stepping out of the game!! hes cheap..but ICC will keep him...coz its a governing body govrned by the ones who dont want the game 2 prosper
2006-10-09 16:23:36 · answer #4 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Darrel Hair followed the rules, simple! Inzy chose not to come back and play. Get over it!!!
2006-10-09 20:53:23 · answer #5 · answered by swampylagoon 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, certainly, they are in a bad need of a 'Hair Cut', but what to do, they don't have a trimmer which can cut that Hair. Only a village 'Naai' (barber) from Asia can do that.
2006-10-09 16:59:53 · answer #6 · answered by Abrar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea, but I heard that it was Inzamam's problem. He did not play the match after the problem. I don't think it is Darrel's reason.
2006-10-09 04:41:55 · answer #7 · answered by chunnu 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes i think u r absoloutely right
it should have a hair cut
2006-10-09 07:35:00 · answer #8 · answered by siddharth 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
now stop this issue!
there has been a much big discussion on yahoo! answers on this issue!
2006-10-09 04:44:25 · answer #9 · answered by aki 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
darrel hair .... was gud . he was fair . LOl
2006-10-09 09:45:09 · answer #10 · answered by punjabiking200 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋