I find that almost impossible to believe, is there anyway you can prove it - lets try shall we
Uppercase
M
W
There is a 30 degree angular retraction from the perpendiucular to the line of the second protagonist manifesting in a di-surgent malpropping of the lingular intersection
Lowercase
m
w
The radiused arcs of the m's gently sweeping top brows are in stark contrast to the angular, almost post-modernist design of the lower case w.
Completely different, who is stupid now, stupid-face?!
2006-10-09 04:15:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
and what's up with lower case 'n's? They're just upside down 'u's. We have too many posers in the alphabet.
2006-10-09 04:02:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, our Prez is an upside-down "M", and I must say he's pretty damned stupid.
2006-10-09 04:00:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by x 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mmmm Hmmmm
2006-10-09 04:01:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by kim_strng 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the "M's" are upside down "W's".
I thought everyone knew that.
2006-10-09 04:06:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥Pamela♥ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you hear about the blonde that got fired from the M&M company? Yeah she got fired for throwing out all the W's.
2006-10-09 04:04:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Marenight 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha....i think when the language was made...they ran out of ideas????
2006-10-09 03:59:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by zuli 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
its a strange world!!
2006-10-09 04:01:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by jenzi_e 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya right....but r u going to ask something now or not??
2006-10-09 03:59:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
maybe that's why my M&M's looked at me funny this morning.....
2006-10-09 04:00:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋