if people casually made comments not supportive of Israel and Israelly people the way they bash around the US in public forums would they be called anti - semite? Is critique of Isreal taboo and out of bounds as a topic in the public forum ?
note: I am 100% not advocating making comments against Isreal or the US or anyone. And I don't support nations i support people... period.
2006-10-09 03:24:44 · 9 answers · asked by zigzagidiot 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
i would venture to say that - thanks to the extreme left, the ACLU, and special interest groups - you are not allowed to bash ANYONE or ANYTHING, except Christianity and George W. Bush
2006-10-09 06:51:57 · answer #1 · answered by }pixie{ 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Usually any criticism of Israel, regardless of how valid it is, will initiate a series of attacks and accusations from the well-organized Zionist network. The person will be accused of being anti-semite, and if he or she happens to be Jewish, then he'll be accused of being a self-hating Jew...there's even an internet site providing such a list. Some of the world's most sincere, peace loving and truly respectable people in the world are on this list! The Zionists, through their immense immense control of strategic resources such as the media have created an atmosphere where criticism of Israel carries unpleasant consequences, like not being elected if you are a politician. However, the atrocities committed by Israel and its supporters are so monstrous and blatant that despite all their bullying and falsifying techniques, people are becoming increasingly literate. I suppose the Germans had their Nazis, and the Jews have their Zionists, and just as the "glory" days of Nazism passed, this will pass, too.
2006-10-09 03:53:30 · answer #2 · answered by peace m 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
some Jews will certainly play the Holocaust card, yet many anti-Semites play the Zionism card. "criticism" of Israel has develop into the hot smoke demonstrate screen which anti-Semites use to furnish their hatred a semblance of legitimacy. Many solutions to this rant illustrate this particularly vividly. The attempt which distinguishes between a beneficial and impartial criticism of Israel as damaging to masked anti-Semitism is extremely corresponding to which you will prepare to the different us of a, which incorporates the US. "criticism of Israel" is quite anti-Semitism while: a million. It denies Israel the suited to exist, the two explicitly or implicitly by denying it the suited to look after itself against aggression. 2. It legitimizes the advocacy of Israel's destruction on the floor of "pluralism of opinions" or the like. 3. It singles out the Jewish human beings because of the fact the only human beings interior the international who have not any appropriate to self-decision. 4. It matters Israel to surprisingly diverse and better human rights and conflict standards than different countries -- especially, its Arab acquaintances. 5. It, regardless of each and every of the dislaimers, makes use of the words Israel, Jews, and Zionists interchangeably. All people who say that Muslim extremists hate in basic terms Israel and not Jews, I even have 2 words for you: Daniel Pearl. 6. it is bundled up with claims of international Jewish conspiracy and demands proscribing the get admission to by Jews to training and jobs. 7. It provides the Holocaust and the historic previous of persection against the Jews as their very own justification -- i.e. if the Jews have been taken care of so badly, they could have deserved it. virtually 2 million little ones died interior the Holocaust -- what did they ever do to you? possibly the non secular fundamentalists spewing this concept could ask themselves why they are hated lots. 8. It potential that Jews -- and by extension, Israelis -- have specific ethical duties, diverse from each and every physique else's, to no longer get as much as persecution and aggression, and to no longer combat for the betterment of their lives. sure, Saint Mahatma Ghandi, who suggested that ecu Jews in international conflict II had extra suitable suicide themselves, replaced into an anti-Semite (and that assertion of his constantly made me ask your self what he, a South African citizen, replaced into doing in India).
2016-10-16 00:09:21 · answer #3 · answered by lander 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are after Egyptian journalists for writing in Egyptian newspapers against Israel..wow America is acting as it was the big Israeli policeman.
2006-10-09 03:59:43 · answer #4 · answered by mido 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't even mention Israel you frothing at the moth anti-semite!!!
Shhhhhhh! Shhhhhhhhh!
Don't mention that place!
Antisemite is the worn out trump card of the morally bankrupt who support Zionist aggression.
2006-10-09 03:29:27 · answer #5 · answered by Duque de Alba 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Because certain events in history in Europe people in that country tend to victimize themselves today. They use history as an excuse. Well actually the grandchildren of the victims are the murderers of today.
2006-10-09 03:36:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
It's Israely. Anthing it's possible!!
2006-10-09 03:28:12 · answer #7 · answered by alfonso 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i guess u could criticize anyone u want to for me its usually
someone i know & for a reason.
2006-10-09 03:34:51 · answer #8 · answered by daniel b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what kind of criticism it is.
2006-10-09 03:26:51 · answer #9 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋