English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Depending on your years of experience and the level of work your are searching. In my experience, most people will do just fine with chronological resume. Someone who has over 25 years of experience crossing a lot of roles and industry could easily present their experience chronologically in a couple of pages, then it is better to present them functionally.

However, even a functional resume should still have a quick summary of chronological history. Companies get suspicious when the resume is only functional. They think the candidate is trying to hide gaps in their work history.

Best wishes.

2006-10-09 03:50:20 · answer #1 · answered by JQT 6 · 1 0

Take a look at the three formats yourself and see which one best suits your background and career choice. Chronological is the most common. Employers don't like to hunt for the information they need.

2006-10-09 07:10:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Combination. Gives you the option of both types.

2006-10-09 03:24:09 · answer #3 · answered by Lisa W 3 · 1 0

http://www.careerbuilder.com
http://www.monster.com
http://www.hotjobs.com
http://www.craigslist.org
http:// --->your local newspaper website then click on the classified section and search jobs<-----

Good luck

Tip for a strong resume:

http://www.jobbankusa.com/resumewrite/re...

2006-10-09 10:47:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

combination :)

2006-10-09 22:11:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers