2006-10-09 02:46:05 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
By claiming monopoly on family values they cover up their hideous crimes against those who are poor and need social services and whom were indirectly led to misery by the so called party itself which cut the taxes to the ultra-rich and close an eye on corporate tax evasions . So instead of helping relieve poverty they just hijack the family value subject as their slogan to mislead the masses about their real agenda which is breaking the families to increase the poor and poverty and to be able to stay in control ..Remember :" There is no fortune without crime"
2006-10-09 04:33:48 · answer #1 · answered by fuschiafish 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You used the right word: "claim"
They realised that the people who were critical in elections (moms especially and most southerners) were concerned about the future of their families and kids etc, and played on their fears to gain they votes. As you saw, it worked twice. This time it may not work so well, because:
(i) The claim has been shown to be just that, a claim
(ii) The families are actually suffering themselves
(iii)It was so plain during Katrina that one who says He is a christian, and a compasionate person( aka Prez. Bush) and his administration were slow to not only mobilize the Government to assist "its" people (as they are mandated to), but also did not display the "Good Samaritan" virtue that is charectiristic of Christians
(iv) While opposing "abortion", a family value issue, they on the other hand put in place policies that impoverrishes (eg not reforming minimum wage, not reforming illegal immigration act, not using their strength in Congress/Senate to make changes to Social Security-e.g. find ways to stop the dependance and enslavement of single mothers-esp african americans and others on this dependancy creating system)
(v) People such as DeLay, actually used his non organization (U.S. Family Network) to raise money for himself (PBS had an interesting peiece last week how they did this), and his buddy Abramoff, fleeced the native Americans
(vi)It is all lies, lies, and more lies
2006-10-09 09:29:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
genuinely bloody ridiculous. Terrorists have been taken care of extra valuable than this couple! there is not something incorrect with slapping a newborn on the butt - exceedingly if he's effing and blinding at his mom. i might have belted him one purely for calling her a cow. truthfully the law enforcement officers ought to SEE that the wee bastard hadn't been starved and that i'm particular a actual examination might have shown that he hadn't been abused. The older boy ought to have had extra experience and in a manner, i'm particularly chuffed he's getting/have been given his comeuppance. the only element is this relatives has been ripped aside cos 2 little spoiled feckers could not get what they needed and their wee sister is suffering using fact of it. it is approximately intense time some instruction manual-lines have been put in place to stop this style of element cos this is a entire waste of everybodys time. i in my opinion think of that if extra mothers and fathers skelped their young ones on the butt (not around the top/face) whilst they want it, there'd be much less neds/chavs around. EDIT: specially, all my dad had to do replaced into enhance his voice and that replaced into sufficient bit if i replaced into particularly out of order, I have been given a skelp on the butt. I dread to think of what might've passed off had I swore at him or my mum however! The worst element they ever did replaced into stop the belt in colleges. It replaced right into a deterrent extra desirable than the rest.
2016-10-19 02:00:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Family values are not "take care of the lazy".
If I were lazy my family would not take care of me.
It's called responsibility for your own actions. That is a family value.
2006-10-09 02:52:59 · answer #4 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They claim to have the market cornered on morality too!
and they claim the Iraq war is right and that they have all the answers
SEE A PATTERN
2006-10-09 02:49:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Only rich (campaign contributing) families really count.
2006-10-09 02:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Part of FAMILY VALUES is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.
We do not encourage SLOTH by rewarding laziness.
We do not give CHECKS to reward pregnancies.
2006-10-09 02:59:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
God Helps Them Who Help Themselves...
2006-10-09 03:04:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
caring is one thing, my taking from you to give to another is theft.
you are just ignorant and closed minded to conservativism. try to be more compassionate and open minded.
2006-10-09 02:50:14 · answer #9 · answered by Shiraz the truth detector 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
They didn't cause poverty and they didn't stop social services. So what exactly is your question?
2006-10-09 02:48:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋