English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I dig women don't get things tangled up but women believe they can multi task,most to all the things they do at the same time hardly come out right,One woman does something the rest must follow behind..consider Paris Hilton carrying her little dog around,she made it fashionable to buy ugly dogs and carry them in a handbag and the drones followed.Yes Paris Hilton is not the ambassador of proper women but all the same.Don't say its just the women around me cos its all women. Regardless ? Even Oprah &i dig Oprah lots.

2006-10-09 02:41:08 · 6 answers · asked by Cube 2 in Social Science Gender Studies

Personally i think the people that say this question is generalised or i'm not getting laid or raised by a man are the typical culprits that let the rest of the proper women down.Consider that Paris Hilton is just an example,I could have said Jeniffer Aniston.But the general feel is one jumps for the defensive the rest jump for the defensive.&yes i'm getting laid by a proper woman.Think carefully before answering this question.

2006-10-09 03:41:04 · update #1

6 answers

Oh my goodness.... This site has been an "education" when it comes to seeing how some people in the world think. You say people shouldn't say its just the women around you; but its either the women you've run into or else some twisted view you have of those (and other) women.

While it is true that your question shows that you have tangled up the issue of whether multi-tasking can result in getting things done right and whether some people may have imitated Paris Hilton, that doesn't mean that all women have the same difficulty you do (no disrespect intended, but your assertion that women are "in deficit" is not correct - and, by the way, a "deficit" is something someone has and isn't in).

You remark, "Yes, Paris Hilton is not the ambassador or proper women BUT ALL THE SAME." There is no "all the same" if Paris Hilton is not representative of all women. That is the same as if I said, "I think it will snow today in Tucson. Yes. It doesn't snow it Tucson, but all the same." (!!!)

Paris Hilton didn't invent bringing a dog around. Joan Rivers and a zillion other people with tiny dogs have done that long before Paris Hilton ever did and will do that long after Paris Hilton disappears from public view. No mature man or woman copies a public person. Many immature women AND men may.

There are men who have trouble thinking and men who are amazing thinkers. There are women who have trouble thinking and women who are amazing thinkers. You may not see those women, or maybe you don't want to see them because if you see them you may have to face some realities about yourself.

Normally, I wouldn't critique the grammar of the question someone; but your question is not well written. It shows that you may have some difficulty with certain types of thinking or writing or reasoning. That's fine. Not everyone is a wiz when it comes to some skills. That does not mean, however, that because you have some difficulties with some things that all women do or that women must have even more difficulties than you do.

Paris Hilton and Oprah aren't good examples of women in general because I don't know anyone who knows of any accomplishments of Paris Hilton; and although Oprah has certainly accomplished things in life, she doesn't even do her own hair or make-up or cook her own healthy dinners. If by multi-tasking you mean working and raising children and caring for the home life too; it depends on the woman, the situation, the ages and number of children, and the type of job that woman has. Many women can "multi-task" and be excellent at everything they do. If you're looking to television to see examples you won't necessarily see those examples; and if you're looking at the woman who works in fast-food and leaves her children in the welfare daycare facility you won't see those examples either.

You're entitled to your crummy opinion of women and your apparent need to think so little of so many of them; but most of the world would see you as very misguided.

2006-10-09 06:51:49 · answer #1 · answered by WhiteLilac1 6 · 3 1

I really don't see any real relevance in your question. First you talk about multi-tasking and then move straight on to Paris Hilton carrying a dog around her bag and apparently everyone following suit. You have just made a massive generalisation, and if you think seeing Oprah doing this confirms the relevance of your statement that all women must do this, then that says it all really.......where is the real evidence!

2006-10-09 11:41:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What an amazingly generalized statement. You're using Paris Hilton as an example of all women? And "...all the things they do at the same time hardly come out right"? I think you need to get out more.

2006-10-09 02:50:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Did you in basic terms lookup a glossary in the previous posing your question to purpose and make your self look extra suitable? Fell flat on your face there chum. the only deficiency right that's on your chat. What a shame you're in basic terms conscious of females like Paris Hilton, between the main pointless persons to scouse borrow oxygen from something of the international. Get your self out extra.

2016-12-26 13:26:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Women go into instant denial when negetivity comes into play. That's when they focus on something else. So they don't even know when this is happening. That is why they seem oblivious to what others see without obscurety.

2006-10-09 02:53:33 · answer #5 · answered by TMAC 5 · 1 1

I don't know any women who carry dogs around in bags, maybe it's only american women who are "in deficit concerning the way they think"....

2006-10-09 02:50:46 · answer #6 · answered by rami #1 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers