I was just flicking through an article in the newspaper about some murderer or something and it kept using words like "outrageous", "sickening" and "shocking".
Maybe I'm just jaded, but I was neither outraged, sickened or shocked. How dare the writers of these shitty newspapers presumes to know how I will react to a story (which they, in turn, have oversensationalised)?
"The mood of the people in London today is grim".
Well, I'm people, I'm in London and the only thing I'm pissed off about is idiots thinking they know my mind better than I do myself.
Grr.
2006-10-09 01:52:59 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
So the press in England tells you what to feel? You lucky, lucky man!
Here in the States we have that bastion of journalistic integrity called Fox News, to tell us what to think (and sadly it appears to be working).
2006-10-09 07:39:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a sociopath, I have a real issue knowing which emotion is appropriate...I find that laughter irrespective of how sick and depraved I am being, is always the best policy.
2006-10-09 09:00:59 · answer #2 · answered by Ichi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
laughter definitely is the best policy, especially in the case of murderers who only target mimes and bakers.
2006-10-09 10:35:32 · answer #3 · answered by arrrthelifeofapirate 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sometime i feel the same
2006-10-09 11:49:11 · answer #4 · answered by Jubei 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋