English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

communism was the most extreme injustice - taking everything off everyone and giving it to the top man

i'm talking about the opposite of that - something as sustainable as communism was unsustainable

im talking about the opposite of present capitalism - something as sustainable as present capitalism is unsustainable

present capitalism has 1% getting 90% of world income - ie, 10% away from 1% getting 100% of world income - ie, near perfect slavery - near perfect injustice, near total theft, near total destruction, and near nuclear extinction

the 225 most overpaid ppl hav as much as the 2,500,000,000 most underpaid ppl

the state [globe] built on injustice cannot stand

the founding fathers did their best to limit fortunes - because they knew that unlimited fortunes was tyranny, theft, injustice, undemocracy, unfreedom, terrorism, fascism, dictatorship, evil, slavery, violence, war, crime, destruction, betrayal - every empire has crumbled with extreme overpay underpay

2006-10-09 00:07:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

11 answers

You got all ideas totally wrong. Capitalism is not 1% getting 90% of the world income. No never nobody has given any person to rob the world away with 90% of the income. In fact what is hapenning in Capitalism is that most sucessful person accumulates wealth and the others who are not that much sucessful accumulate the wealth according to their capacity. There is no room for lazyness in captalism and everyone should strive hard to come up in life. Last but not the least every capitalist who has amassed the wealth in a huge way does not keep it for himself but again donates it back to the mankind. This has been hapenning for ages in India the world's largest democaratic country and it is presently hapenning in United States where we can see Bill Gates stepping down from business and going the philiantrophic way.

2006-10-09 00:20:01 · answer #1 · answered by ssmindia 6 · 0 0

You stated ..."communism was the most extreme injustice - taking everything off everyone and giving it to the top man"....

Technically you are wrong cause the idea and manifest of communism was "Let us all have the same" and "Work as much as you can, take as much as you need" which can be called justice. But on the other hand, communism couldnt ever been established for real.

In the case of Russia there was something called socialism and after it became dictatorship. Nowdays theyre transiting towards capitalism (gas control)

In the case of China,well you know how fast they are developing (export to European Union in 2005 was 158 billion euro while inport was "just" around 51,747 billion) faster than most of well developed "capitalistic" countries.

In both cases we have good example of control with no justice, not in the way comunism plead for.
We all se that in the long run, comunism was unsustainable, and it will be as long as economy is based on greed, injustice and control....and that is permanently....or not ;)

2006-10-09 02:57:35 · answer #2 · answered by Mudri 2 · 0 0

i'm an American and communism isn't a thank you to pass. In a communist society, all and sundry is compelled to paintings the place they are instructed and all gets a commission an analogous. in case you have been being paid an analogous volume of money each and every week no matter how confusing you labored, could you paintings? permit's say you labored at an airplane aspects production facility and you probably did a million/2-assed paintings because you mostly have been paid an analogous. it may earnings you, no longer working and getting paid, yet what you do no longer understand is that now airplane aspects are not being made properly so the commerce is going down and advance, the economic device sinks. Communism / Marxism has never been able to proceed to exist because of the folk interior the country. Communism advantages in basic terms the leaders of the country. Capitalism advantages all and sundry, because of the fact there is low government spending, and the folk earn as much as they paintings. you may develop right into a millionaire, or you may pass bankrupt. the alternative, for the main area, is yours. as long because of the fact the government does not impose socialism standards, like well being care, you earn as much as you paintings. Capitalism is trustworthy. long stay Democracy long stay Capitalism long stay Freedom us of a

2016-10-16 00:04:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You're making good points, but you are neglecting to think about everything that every person has done since the dawn of economics that has contributed to the cumulative forward march of progress, as the current state of distribution of wealth is a result of a chain of events stretching back to before the invention of writing, and it is the incentive created by the desire for wealth that has gotten us this far this fast... and the way we have things set up now people are allowed to leave their money to those people that they choose, minus taxes of course. In a sense, we owe the world for building itself. It's not that far to reach, is it? To think that one should be able to leave wealth to ones loved ones? Or to suppose that perhaps one should be able to charge interest if one loans money to another? The system is basically right, we just have a little corruption and some inefficiency. Why should you worry so much about how big a stack of cash some other person has, though? What is he going to do to you with it? Force you to flip him a burger? Worse things have happened, historically speaking. If you don't want to work for a rich person, go work for a poor one. I hear they're hiring. Oh, wait, no, that was the rich people.

Go have some poor kids and complain to them about it.

2006-10-09 00:30:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I don't think it's true that the founding fathers tried to limit their fortunes. Ben Franklin was a multi-milionaire and the father of franchising.

I think your assessment otherwise is correct. No matter which policy one chooses, the rich get richer & the poor get poorer.

I think the only President that tried to change this was Jimmy Carter.

The rich are very powerful people. They made him look REALLY bad. Isn't it interesting that G W Bush has caused hyperinflation in gas prices, and people aren't complaining like they were in the 70's?

support the wealthy...you'll be okay. Become wealthy...you'll be better. You can be like Bill Gates and start a cool foundation & sell your software at the same time (great free publicity...rich get richer :-)

2006-10-09 01:16:09 · answer #5 · answered by Ted Jordan 5 · 0 1

Well, if Americans think that justice = communism, that would explain the lack of justice in that country.

Communism and Capitalism are both the same. The point of both is to make everyone happy, but what happens with both is that ideologies get abused.

Neither is an answer.

2006-10-09 16:37:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I hope not!!!I grew up in communism,lived in that s*** for 13 years.It's the worst thing that can happen to a country-to be under a communistic government.
I am happy and proud my Czech republic got rid of that communistic scum,glad to live in fee Canada and all you people in the US should thank to God or whoever for being born in a free country!

2006-10-09 04:49:16 · answer #7 · answered by Inuyasha 3 · 0 0

Remember what happened to Marie Antoinette.

2006-10-09 01:12:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What?! I am an American and I have NEVER linked those words in my life. Democracy = justice and everything that I will ever want in my government.

2006-10-09 00:10:43 · answer #9 · answered by I am Sunshine 6 · 0 1

They don't.

2006-10-09 00:17:25 · answer #10 · answered by rhymingron 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers