Unless a miracle happens there will never will be an abolishment of the Electoral College. Mainly because if would require an amendment to the US Constitution, which would require 2/3 approval of congress and the state legislatures.
Anything can happen though, back after FDR died in office. There was an admendment to the Constitution limiting the number of terms served. BUT in my thinking that limitations takes away from the voice of the people. Clinton would arguably be President today. Regean might have served for additional terms as well.
Been better for the country? Quite probably so...
2006-10-09 09:59:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by willywonka1999 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Electoral college ought to have been abolished some time past. We observed the undesirable outcomes in the 2000 election of having one state's votes settle on the election in opposition to the want of the human beings. on account that Florida's vote casting replaced into so messed-up, the final courtroom stepped in, overruled the Florida ultimate courtroom and appointed Bush as president. that may not a democratic way of electing presidents. the difficulty with abolishing the Electoral college equipment is that smaller states acquire a representation income under the present equipment. on account that such states even have 2 senators each and every in the Senate, in spite of length, reform isn't likely.
2016-10-19 01:45:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When Florida or Ohio botch up another Presidential election.
2006-10-08 20:12:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ed A 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as those in power think they r the Aristocracy, never!
2006-10-08 19:39:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The sooner the better.
2006-10-09 03:46:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by kman1830 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
never
2006-10-08 19:36:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by gberg_4 3
·
0⤊
0⤋