Or would that not be nice?
2006-10-08 15:56:35 · 17 answers · asked by scarlettt_ohara 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If Kim Jung Il wants a nuke so bad, let's deliver one to him! From 50,000 feet.
2006-10-08 16:09:11 · answer #1 · answered by Jean R 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Am I the only one that's going to show out that Bubbly's in the incorrect communique? Japan? WTF, mate? i'm unable to take the N. Korean dude heavily on account that observing group us of a of america. i understand this is a reasonably stupid element to declare, in spite of the fact that I at the instant are unable to assist it! perhaps Bush observed the action picture too. the finished element with Iraq is sticky. it is advantageous that Saddam is out. he's an evil guy who killed threat unfastened persons. that doesn't recommend the ends justify the way, yet back, he's out. Now that we now have made a royal mess of the area, we can not only go away the Iraqi women and adult males human beings intense and dry. WE further democracy over there, so we are able to ought to assist safeguard it. it remains an risky us of a, and this is our fault. We did a similar element in Japan after WW2, suited? What purpose might N. Korea have in the event that they DID deliver nukes our skill? the different dominant worldwide places of the sector will not take NK's factor. NK may be mass chaos if it have been to accomplish a little element like that. In that appreciate, it is not a threat (don't get me incorrect, it is). In Iraq tension had for use using actuality reasoning only wasn't reducing it. NK needs to be a powerforce in the international, so NK has to act like one and negotiate if it needs to sit down down on the lunch table with the entertainment of the cool worldwide places. they are diverse international locations with particular situations, and as a effect they ought to be dealt with yet differently. must you particularly think of Bush's administration isn't thoroughly conscious of the seize 22 difficulty in NK (you're, so maximum possibly they are going to be on the least a step ahead of you, whoever you would be), you're only undeniable ig'nant.
2016-10-19 01:35:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, you can not nuke them because China, south Korea and Russia and Japan will have plenty of people die of the radioactive fall out.
Now, it is troop calling up time. UN and US will start discuss about the action plan and see how to take out the regime.
2006-10-08 16:01:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No we can't. If we did that then the world would know that we didn't destroy all of our nuclear devices. Shhhh! Don't tell anyone that we still have the capibilities to blow North Korea off the face of the earth.
But due to the Nuclear Prolifrelation Treaty we can't expose ourselves.
2006-10-08 16:03:55 · answer #4 · answered by bro_ken128 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
has everybody forgotten the the USA is the only country ever to use nuclear weapons against another country? why should we tell other countries that they cant have nukes when we should be considered the only real nuclear threat in the world?
2006-10-08 16:26:44 · answer #5 · answered by yosef 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Can they nuke us now?not very nice.
2006-10-08 16:10:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. We can't just go around preemptively nuking every country.
2006-10-08 16:07:52 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This question displays a chilling lack of compassion for the millions of innocent lives that would turn to horror if this happened. You might be included in the casualties. "Nukular" war is nothing anyone should ever kid about.
2006-10-08 16:11:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
And have the Chinese respond? Get real.
Add: The north koreans have confirmed they did.
2006-10-08 16:00:15 · answer #9 · answered by notme 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What the hell,lets nuke 'em.
2006-10-08 16:00:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋