so after 9/11, we leave our search for Osama and invade Iraq on the basis that they have nuclear weapons. we get there, now where is the nuclear weapons? exactly, and were still there on the basis that we are fighting the war on terrorism which is the same crap Bush feeds everyone all day long, so if were fighting the war on terror, we should remove Bush because hes the real terrorist behind the deaths of innocent people. deaths are a casualty of war and i agree with that, but of a pointless and morally wrong war is something which i can never forgive, some of my friends came back from Iraq, and the stories they tell me, of how they are commanded to kill innocent civilians which are suspected of being suicide bombers and which are nothing more than civilians. the Bush administration can go *** themselves for everything they've done, and the hilarious thing is that we make such a big deal about clinton's infidelity, what about bush's hypocritical war on terror?
2006-10-08
15:00:29
·
12 answers
·
asked by
balanced112
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
sure, i accept facts, just there is no facts which can justify the killing of a innocent human being.
2006-10-08
15:05:36 ·
update #1
k so now that we removed saddam from office, just stop the war?
2006-10-08
15:12:21 ·
update #2
Repuglicans, don't ya just lov em. Not one of their answers will ever admit that the president lied and many have died. Hey, here is a clue for all of you repuglicans, it is about money, got to feed the war machine. Bush and his rich buddy's including the oil company's are making a mint off of this war and it isn't likely to change until the government changes, hopefully there are more of me that sees the truth and less of you that is being led by Rush Limbaugh and faux news. What a bunch of dumb azzes you all are.
2006-10-08 15:11:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
We didnt invade Iraq because of nuclear weapons, we invaded because Saddam was playing hide-and-go-seek with the UN weapons inspectors. We felt that after 9/11, Saddam giving chemical weapons to terrorists to use on foreign soil wasnt a risk we were willing to take and we had had about enough of Saddams antics.
What deaths of what innocent people? When our troops are shot at, they shoot back at the insurgents. Do you consider a hate-filled Muslim insurgent trying to kill our troops "innocent?"
Without a war on terror, that only keeps our country in jeopardy. Remember when 4 airplanes were used as weapons on Sept 11th 2001? 2 of them crashed into the WTC and collapsed them. You liberals sure have a short memory! You guys are so silly with your insistance we do nothing about terrorism. God help us if more inept wimpy liberals are voted into office!
2006-10-08 15:14:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think there is a lot of facts missing from the puzzle and no one is government seems to care. And, now still ordering more troops over there what are they really looking for? Everyday you hear on the news that something happing in Iraq. Some one know more information and needs to spill the beans.
2006-10-08 15:22:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michael R 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
http://web.archive.org/web/20050305091139/www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm
The mass deception behind Iraq is so deep most of us could not handle the truth.
The American people are so deceived here on the home front, we really need not go overseas looking for deception, it's right here under our noses.
99% of Americans do not know and possibly would not understand the significance of THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATELY OWNED CORPORATION!!! The word FEDERAL in the name is misleading.
World economics of the NEW WORLD ORDER
IS BEHIND IRAQ.
PUT YOUR HIP BOOTS ON, THE ****** IS DEEP!
2006-10-08 15:38:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by xman77 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
What Europe did to Hitler, the liberals prefer to do to the famous-day Hitlers (bin weighted down, Armeddinijad). we could nip this interior the bud formerly thousands and thousands extra Jews and individuals die because of the fact of terrorists. God Bless Our Troops.
2016-10-15 23:51:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Money is the absolute truth behind Iraq.
Money for corporations that put Bush and Co. in office.
Americans die because the rich need more money.
2006-10-08 15:19:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
We lost the moment we decided to invade Iraq. We had Iraq boxed in. Now it's a matter of seeing how bad it gets. Nobody, Republican or Democrat, has presented a viable way to proceed. I knew going in was bad news, but I honestly have no idea how to get out.
2006-10-08 15:05:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by s. k 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
That's odd I have friends that came back and they talked about how they found Nerve gas mustard gas,how our media lies to us about the truth over there, they built schools, helped set up the beginning of an infrastructure.
2006-10-08 15:06:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Saddam had the audacity to ask George bush, to give him one of his daughters for his harem,this infuriated George so much that he vowed to destroy Saddam
2006-10-08 15:09:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by acid tongue 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you really want to know? Or is your mind made up to the point that you will reject facts?
Let's try it:
1) Saddam Hussein sends his tanks to conquer Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, vowing to take over the entire Middle East oil production to choke off the west. This was his retaliation against the US imposing sanctions after he gassed several villages to death.
2) After the US defeats Saddam militarily, the UN decides to offer him a temporary cease-fire in which he is required to hand over all WMD including chemical weapon artillery shells, bio-weapons and the means for producing them.
3) Saddam gets busy stalling, deceiving and refusing to cooperate. So, the UN imposes sanctions against him (rather than call off the cease-fire). Saddam builds five new palaces while using the sanctions as an excuse to starve entire villages to death. UNICEF reported that, during the cease-fire, between 5,000 and 6,000 children were dying each month from deprivation. They don't count adults.
4) In 1998, President Clinton gave Saddam one last, final chance to cooperate. Saddam refused. Clinton bombed Iraq for days. Clinton and Congress approved the Iraq Liberation Act making it official US policy to remove Saddam by force. Clinton tried to eliminate Saddam's regime the same way George Bush Senior used the CIA to eliminate the Soviets from Afghanistan. Clinton failed miserably, getting lots of Iraqis killed in the process.
5) Saddam kicked dirt at Clinton and laughed, "Is THAT all you got??" He spent the next four years ignoring demands that he allow the UN inspectors back in.
6) In 1999, Saddam got busy on his nuclear weapons program again. He tried to buy replacement bomb triggers from Siemens but the order was intercepted.
Iraq: Saddam's nuclear shopping spree to develop atomic weapons including Triggers from Siemens
http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/lithotripter.html
Saddam tried to form a business relationship with Niger to get uranium 'off the books' but Niger refused.
Impeach The Media, Not Bush - CIA's man Wilson confirmed Bush's uranium statement
http://www.aim.org/publications/weekly_column/2003/07/17.html
British Intelligence, Wilson's report CONFIRM Iraq's attempt to purchase uranium from niger in 1999
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/07/12/sprj.irq.uk.uranium.straw/
7) In 2002, GW Bush and the UN (Resolution 1441) gave Saddam one last, final chance to obey the cease-fire mandates. Hans Blix's report of February, 2003, revealed that Saddam was still concealing WMD that the inspectors knew to be in his possession.
Saddam had sealed his fate.
GW Bush sent in the tanks.
Since then, we have found over 500 of the banned chemical weapon artillery shells (that the UN inspectors could not find for an entire decade) as well as biological samples for bio-weapons (handed over by a scientist who had been ordered to conceal them), plus the master copy for a uranium enrichment centrifuge.
Saddam was caught red-handed, guilty as charged. The only question remaining is, how much more of his WMD stuff did he send off to Syria during the 6 months France bought him?
8) We are NO LONGER FIGHTING A WAR AGAINST IRAQ! We are now fighting IN DEFENSE OF IRAQ's legitimately elected government, representing its people, to protect Iraq against Islamists sent by Syria and Iran (plus Al Qaeda) to try and take over Iraq. The people of Iraq need our help to protect them from the brutal tyranny those Islamists will impose if we do pull out. They would suffer the same horrible fate Afghanistan did during the 1990s when we made the mistake of not remaining there to help that country rebuild.
2006-10-08 15:03:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by speakeasy 6
·
4⤊
1⤋