What should be done about Darfur?

Question

What country or countries should have the reponsibility to do something?

What exactly should be done?

Answer 1

The only thing that would be effective is all-out war to exterminate the Islamists who are waging the final stage of Jihad - murdering anyone who is not Islamic.

But your question is, 'should' it be done?

Leftists in the US insist we should not 'attack' a nation that has not attacked us. They would rather see those hundreds of thousands of innocents murdered than see our people fight the tyrannical brutes who are going around raping 3 year old girls. Yeah, I saw that on CNN last night. Raping little children just 3 years old and doing them permanent physical harm in an effort to further brutalize the non-Muslim population.

Should we do anything? Ethically, YES! I doubt the Leftists will let it happen, though.

When brutal tyranny is unopposed, humanity slides back towards its darker, more animalistic past.

Answer 2

Unbelievable! I just got through answering another question about this very same subject. My answer is "Who Cares"! America has no national security interest in Darfur whatsoever. Those people can go right on slaughtering each other until the cows come home for all I care. The ONLY thing that should ever matter is America's national security.
You people bleed too much!

Answer 3

Britain can't afford any more adventures or aid packages.It was never a part of our Empire. We owe the country nothing; and neither does the US. Egypt ruled it , so leave the problem to the Africans themselves.Everybody screams about what harm the colonisation of Africa is supposed to have caused, but at least the people were fed, and there was order.

Answer 4

First world troops are needed to establish law and order.

Colonisation would be my answer Europe should send troops and colonise the country.

Its better than Genocide and would allow us to begin bringing Africa into the 21st century.

If we want world peace and order we need to stop whats happening in Africa. If you brought peace, food, basic health and the chance for self improvement then no one in those countries would complain

Answer 5

What should be done is being done. The good forces of the African Union are keeping the peace over there and because they are black locals, they understand what is going on and their good work should continue. You can rest easy now.

Answer 6

Personally and truthfully, I think the refugees of Darfur should be sent to surrounding countries. The country itself is too far gone and war-torn to do anything truely effective.

And for the love of Pete, don't send the U.N. to do anything! (Because they won't!)

Answer 7

The country should be invaded, the current power structure disbanded, and new leaders placed in power. The only power with the ability and the guts to do that is the US... But no one wants us to be the "Police of the World".... unless we aren't, then we get blamed for not acting. Stupid Liberals

Answer 8

Discover oil there. The developed world would have armies there in a shot.

Answer 9

Don't send the US. Oh I forgot, they wouldn't go anyway; there's nothing there for them to make a profit from and no one to sell arms to.

Answer 10

We need to help them.