Will liberals try to make it to where illegal immigrant can run for office?

Question

Will Rico Or Juan be running in 2012?

Answer 1

Heck they're working on the Al-Quada Bill of Rights

Want to give terrorists Geneva Convention protection and amnesty probably isn't to far behind that.

So if they'll give the terrorists amnesty, the illegals are going to get it too

Answer 2

Liberal Supreme Court Justices might do it. Have you ever heard of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)?

The state of Texas had created a law (May 1975) requiring that all children enrolled in the public schools be either U.S. citizens or legal immigrants -- prohibiting illegals. A little more than two years later a lawsuit was filed in Tyler, TX challenging the law as a violation of the 14th Amendment's guarantee of the equal protection of the laws. All three levels of the federal courts came to the same basic conclusion -- the law is unconstitutionally discriminatory. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling was by a narrow margin, 5 to 4, with Justice Brennan writing the majority opinion, for himself and Justices Blackmun, Marshall, Powell, and Stevens. (In previous cases, Justices Blackmun and Powell had taken the view that the state may constitutionally ban legal immigrants from jobs as police officers (Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978)) and that getting an education is not a constitutionally guaranteed fundamental right (San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973)).) My "favorite" (note the sarcasm) part of Brennan's opinion for the Court is, "It is difficult to understand precisely what the State hopes to achieve by promoting the creation and perpetuation of a subclass of illiterates within our boundaries, surely adding to the problems and costs of unemployment, welfare, and crime." What a swell job of understanding the motives of the Texas legislature.

Six years after the Plyler decision, Professor David P. Currie, writing a two-volume text called "The Constitution in the Supreme Court," had harsh words for this particular decision. He wrote, "With all due respect, this is carrying solicitude a little far. Public resources are scarce and those who have no business being here can have poor claim on them. I may have a right to keep a burglar out of my house, the Court appears to be saying, but once he is there I must invite him to dinner."

Answer 3

For all we know they already have. The illegals are laughing and bragging how they are going to take over the country. They brag about the number of babies they have and the people who are already in office are doing the same thing. The also brag about how scared the citizens are. They say we are old and on the way out. I don't recall any American wanting to go to Mexico except perhaps criminals running away from the law.

Answer 4

Hey Ha AH I thought you cut & runned.

Liberals don't want the Republican backed Moujahadien holding elected office. They want more pro dope hippies in office.

Go big Red Go

Answer 5

I am liberal and do not believe that illegal's should be able to run for public office...in fact I believe illegal's are just that...illegal, they are breaking the law and should be dealt with as such. Not all liberals are crazy commies..

Answer 6

At the very least they want the wetbacks given the right to vote. And guess who the wetbacks will vote for? They'll vote for whoever will offer them a free ride with a juicy meal-ticket. And we all know which political party has that little specialization on their resume'. Can you spell D-e-m-o-c-r-a-t?

Answer 7

The real Q is border security! Are you seriously going to trust that to a democrat? : O

"star wars imperial march theme"

Answer 8

There's no shred of evidence that liberals support illegal aliens. . Bush wants to give work permits and amnesty. Do you consider him a liberal?

John says liberals "Want to give terrorists Geneva Convention protection" - I say this is what all other civilized countries would do. The US is considered a rogue nation for rejecting the Conventions, for torturing prisoners and holding them without charges.

Then John makes these leaps - liberals want to give "Al-Quada Bill of Rights" and "amnesty". He is saying that if we do not torture prisoners, we will then wind up pardoning them. Have we freed all the criminals from our regular jails?

Speaking of freeing terrorists, have you heard Bush wants to free an old Cuban terrorist who is in detention because he is in the US illegally. He's wanted by Cuba and Venezuela for blowing up a plane with 73 people in it. The US Justice Department agrees that he is a terrorist. But because it's Cuba and Venezuela who want him, he may be freed by Bush. If you think I'm exaggerating, read this.

Answer 9

Don't be ridiculous, they will never share power with someone who is not, from a family line or political, corporate family dynasty to be elected to a position of power. Did you really eat paint chips when you were young? Gee i thought that gal was only kidding.

Answer 10

Why don't you ask Bush and the GOP this question, there as much for illegal immigration as the democrats or anyone else. Or are you just ignorant and can't figure that out for yourself?