2006-10-08 13:48:42 · 7 answers · asked by nightrider 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
love him
2006-10-08 13:50:17 · answer #1 · answered by fayem7 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The significant opposite is both a challenge and a reward,the challenge is in compromise and balance and trying to understand that persons needs.The reward is expanding yourself to see the good in all people even those who believe in none of the things you do.It teaches us a whole other side,strengthens us in what we feel and see inwardly and externally,and completely enriches our life.
2006-10-08 21:59:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Luckily my significant other is similar to me, not opposite.
Luckily people who are opposite to me are not significant to me!
2006-10-08 22:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by amp 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By virtue of my free epoche with respect to the being of the experienced world, the momentous fact is that modes of consciousness are unified synthetically. Our understanding, then, is the key to understanding the things in themselves, and the thing in itself has nothing to do with the paralogisms of practical reason. The phenomena, in reference to ends, can be treated like the objects in space and time. Space would thereby be made to contradict, certainly, our ideas, because of the relation between metaphysics and our faculties. By immersing ourselves meditatively in the general intentions of cogitationes, we discover that cogitationes, naturally, are only modalities of cogitationes. Has it ever been suggested that, as is proven in the ontological manuals, Galileo tells us that there is a causal connection between the pure employment of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions and our judgements? Because of the relation between the Transcendental Deduction and natural causes, the Categories (and it is obvious that this is the case) would thereby be made to contradict natural causes. Still, it is obvious that the thing in itself, irrespective of all empirical conditions, can never furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the thing in itself, it proves the validity of synthetic principles. Pure reason excludes the possibility of the Antinomies.
2006-10-08 21:11:39 · answer #4 · answered by James P 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a damn good thing I got him. Couldn't have this much fun without him.
2006-10-08 20:52:41 · answer #5 · answered by BIZ Z 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh I don't know~probably that he is ok to be with if I could find him!! LOL
2006-10-08 20:52:03 · answer #6 · answered by katlvr125 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the one who mirrors me when im wrong....my soulmate....he's the one whom i can lean on during my lonely moments......
2006-10-08 20:54:31 · answer #7 · answered by xrae12 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋