English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i just wanted to no your thoughts on abortion. i am personally against it but i want to know your viewpoint of it. if your for it why and how can you support your cause. if you are against it explain why your against it.

2006-10-08 13:46:42 · 15 answers · asked by Shello 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Against it, because it's the most evil thing a person can do to an innocent child. I can't justify killing a child because some woman doesn't want to take responsibility of screwing around.

2006-10-08 13:51:58 · answer #1 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0 5

I'm morally against it and would like to see it gone one day, but I also know that to just suddenly outlaw it would have disastrous results. It just seems to me that if we want to continue to see the abortion numbers dropping, then more needs to be done to help women who would get an abortion not get pregnant in the first place.

2006-10-08 13:50:00 · answer #2 · answered by bennyjoe81 3 · 2 0

a man should not weight in on use of a woman's body.. unless there is significant payment to house his sperm. pre arranged and agreed.
neither should a church who won't support the child and mother.
shouldn't be used as birth control but a mistake the child usually pays a high price and sometimes the mother for the rest of their life.

fathers still (except when they do full custody) rarely give 50% of the cost or burden.
what would you do if by accident you became a father. would you be able to pay at least 50% and enough to support a child? if not you should reconsider your beliefs.
almost no adopted children are totally undamaged from it. it is also for emergency not as birth control option.

i believe in Science and God and at a certain point the fetus, a parasite,becomes a child is "sentient" and at that point it becomes murder.
at what point do you believe it has a soul according to the bible and mention of the hall of souls etc. its at birth. because of science i believe in more than the bible and associated writings state. see the above.

2006-10-08 14:03:48 · answer #3 · answered by homelessinorangecounty 3 · 1 1

If it has been born, then the killing would be murder. I'm pretty sure most people would agree on that, and wouldn't even think about why the line is drawn at birth, rather than allow parents to "abort" troublesome teenagers.

I don't see Capital Punishment as being relevant. The condemned committed some deliberate act, and had a chance to defend themselves in court.

I'd be curious to know why people think the unborn are a different species than those who have been born, myself. It really makes no sense.

2006-10-08 13:59:28 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 1 2

Abortion is a p poor means of birth control, however I don't think that the government ought to get involved in it and I don't think that it is anybodies business but the people involved. I am older and I have lived in a time when it was illegal and girls still get them, but they do it in sleazy motels and back alleys, many girls died from bleeding to death or from infection. While Abortion is a bad thing I think we should leave that up to each individual and let God sort it out.

2006-10-08 13:57:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Being "professional-selection" is meant to guard freedoms and liberties in our way of existence. at an identical time as i'm no longer supportive of law that cuts off the superb to have an abortion, I do think of abortion with egocentric purpose is erroneous. what's egocentric purpose? maximum abortions fall into that classification. people recklessly have intercourse, get pregnant, and then be certain for besides the fact that reason to terminate the being pregnant. i can't communicate religiously considering is beside the point. yet what's obvious to me is that existence itself has a significant purpose this is plenty too significant for us to stay away from it. Abortion is being abused very corresponding to marriages. The divorce value maintains to be severe because of the fact everybody is uneducated, have little uncomplicated experience and morals, are lazy and self absorbed, and in basic terms undeniable think of that "freedom" potential they might do besides the fact that they desire while they desire. The extra advantageous generations of the previous have been plenty extra possibly to shop a existence over struggling with one. even nevertheless an unborn infant has no clean identity or character to win us over, it remains a existence that has already been created. a considered necessary component of existence has already taken place this is stated as "concept". it is an often underrated component of existence this is taken care of insignificantly. in case you dont desire a baby, save your legs closed. this is the main suitable answer. It sickens me to work out young little ones of this era label themselves as "professional selection". all persons who're 30 or older understand a concern or 2 approximately how issues was once and how they might desire to be. And we additionally comprehend that this era's youthful ones are spoiled and lazy and infrequently artwork as complicated as we as quickly as did. they're materialistic and subsequently don't understand empathy and gratitude that usually take years to totally improve. As a section result we see a huge group of folk who think of its o.k. to "deliver somethin back" in the event that they do no longer like it. a hundred% money back assure. kind of tells you some thing approximately our little ones and money. Spoiled rotten they're. This era needs a actual awaken call.

2016-10-02 02:33:09 · answer #6 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

you and I can brainstorm all the pros and cons all day. But ultimately, no matter what the law, every woman in a tough spot will have to weigh these out for herself. No cookie-cutter policy or philosophy can be arbitrarily imposed; there'll always be a way around it. I don't believe anyone else has a moral right to interfere.

2006-10-08 14:01:53 · answer #7 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1 0

First of all, I believe that Roe v. Wade must be overturned someday. It must be overturned foremost because it was and still is an incorrect interpretation of the Constitution. "Our obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate our own moral code." Watta load of crap.

Secondly, once Roe is overturned, I'd be quite willing to vote in favor of keeping pre-viability abortion legal in my state. The main reason I say that is because I believe in compromise. A closely related reason for why I'd do it is because I want the screaming harpies to stop screeching -- "Keep your laws off of my body!" God, how I hate that expression! It's like fingernails on a chalkboard! I'd do virtually anything at all for those harpies to stop screeching that!

Anything except "compromise" with the Constitution. Roe v. Wade MUST be overturned.

2006-10-08 14:46:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

If you don't want KIDS use BIRTH control Not Murder. Abortion is Not Birth Control Why can't Pro Choice people call it what it Truly is Murder. Who even invented the Word Abortion? Some Pro Choice Person who couldn't handle calling it what it is Murder.

2006-10-08 13:56:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Abortion is really gray. Some view masturbation as abortion. How far could abortion laws be extended?

2006-10-08 13:49:14 · answer #10 · answered by jimmywalls1982 3 · 1 1

An abortion decision should be between a person and their conscience only.

A convict was once asked....What could be done to keep people out of prison..? .....His reply...People should stop having unwanted children...

Outlaw abortion and you'll see prisons fill up like never before..

2006-10-08 14:07:48 · answer #11 · answered by Madmax 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers