they have to represent their regements in the red nose day fun run and the children in need sack race.... lordy the pressures of royalty eh!
2006-10-08 12:04:16 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
i say send them there as we dont need them or anyother of the monarchy, waste of tax payers money.
2006-10-08 12:13:20 · answer #1 · answered by exile 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I Am An American So I Do Not Get The Monarchy Thing However It Would Be A Waste Of Man Power Having To Guard Them From The Raghead Idiots.Best To Leave Them Out Of The Type Conflict These Two R...
2006-10-08 12:13:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If The Duke of Cambridge needs to serve in a wrestle zone extra skill to him. i do not imagine it is going to likely be accessible each and every time quickly, a minimum of no longer with Harry there at the same time. i do not imagine William has been deployed to an lively wrestle zone ever. so some distance as i understand the finest Royal deployed for a wrestle excursion earlier Harry develop into The Duke of York, who flew a Lynx anti-submarine helicopter on patrol with the job rigidity despatched to launch the Falklands from the Argentinians.
2016-12-04 10:19:00 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are next in line for the throne if Charles should peg it. All the medals you see on Charles when he wears his uniform are from his late Uncle, Lord Mountbatten who was killed by the IRA.
William and Harry are not really that bothered about who becomes the next King of England. If you think about it, what the FU-K are our boys doing in IRAQ anyway...its all about who controls the OIL.
2006-10-08 14:14:06 · answer #4 · answered by Le Baron 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They'd stop the war before letting them go. If we treated everyone's children so gingerly the world would be a wonderful place.
2006-10-08 12:12:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are 2nd and 3rd in line to the throne. and if they get kidnapped, they will not only themselves be in danger, but everyone that they command. Both boys say that they want to go. They don't want to be left behind.
2006-10-08 16:19:59 · answer #6 · answered by stargirl2000s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem if they go is that there's the potential for them being kidnapped and the British government being held to ransom.
2006-10-08 12:13:30 · answer #7 · answered by Phil 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
my understanding is that they will serve wherever the regiment serves there is precedence Mountbatten and Phil the Greek served in action during the second world war and their uncle Andrew served in the Falklands
2006-10-08 12:33:17 · answer #8 · answered by xj8jagman 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know what you are talking about, but reportedly there's concern for their safety so Clearance House or whoever don't want them to be in the front lines.
2006-10-08 12:09:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think they can not go because is too dangerous over there for them, aor any important people in the world, royal or not.
2006-10-08 14:47:48 · answer #10 · answered by pelancha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋