English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Not really. The problem would be lack of gun safety and people who think they just wave them around to make people afraid.

2006-10-08 11:35:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would not let my house own a gun. The house has no eyes to see who it would shooting at & no hands to open fire with. It would be like giving a pig keys to a car.

2006-10-08 11:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by donronsen 6 · 0 0

Fear is what creates more acts of fear. If people start getting that paraniod, the status quo for criminals is going to go just as high. Weather you think fear is good or not, it's going to cause more problems and accidents than not. I think it's a pretty bad idea, we don't need more firearms, you know?

2006-10-08 11:37:53 · answer #3 · answered by Harsh Noise Wall 4 · 0 0

Who's house? If you mean if someone in the house had to own a gun ,no.A gun is to often tured on the one who has it.no ,no guns.

2006-10-08 11:37:00 · answer #4 · answered by Mom 6 · 0 0

Yes, but only if all peeps knew firearm safety that lived in that house

2006-10-08 11:36:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

I sincerely believe that we WOULD, IF the owners were skilled in handling the weapon.

2006-10-08 11:35:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

all the way around.

2006-10-08 11:35:53 · answer #7 · answered by barrabas 3 · 0 0

of course.

2006-10-08 11:36:31 · answer #8 · answered by sup 5 · 1 0

maybe

2006-10-08 11:35:13 · answer #9 · answered by Cody M 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers