English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do we have the ight to play god with dogs lives. we can't put down humans who murder and attack people
why are dogs lives less important than a humans

2006-10-08 09:24:37 · 30 answers · asked by Sarah 3 in News & Events Other - News & Events

30 answers

What about the people that get attacked or the children that get killed by these vicious dogs. They are usually bred even cross bred for one reason and yet the innocent have suffered for it.

When you step on an ant or a bug and kill it, do you not consider that matters because they're less than human?!!!

2006-10-08 09:32:01 · answer #1 · answered by Dragon Empress 6 · 3 1

The fact that the life of a human being has more value than that
of a dog is self-evident. Vicious dogs are a danger to everyone and everything around them,including other animals,and should
be put down. If a dog attacked a child,would you hesitate to kill the
dog to save the child's life? I think like most people you probably
wouldn't,and rightly so.

2006-10-08 12:18:14 · answer #2 · answered by Alion 7 · 0 1

I cant believe some people who take the whole save the animal thing too far.we're talking about vicious dogs here,not your average neighbourhood friendly pooch.These are dogs who savage babys and so on.Humans rule this earth.Its a fact,not a boast.Of course its our right, our race is far superior,thats why it feels more moraly right to put a dog down for murder than a human, because humans rule.

2006-10-08 22:05:43 · answer #3 · answered by tam cowan 2 · 0 0

Ofcourse a Dog's life is less valid than a Persons[Human beings].
Are u telling me that if 1 of your Family or friends got Mauled and
seriously Disfigured by a Dangerous dog,you would wring your
Hands and say 'It was'nt the poor Dog's Fault'.
When Dog's develop the Power of Speech,and or free choice
I will see.
Until then I disagre with u!!!!!

2006-10-12 01:11:08 · answer #4 · answered by ralf5@btinternet.com 2 · 0 0

No canines is ever to previous. I hate to point fingers even with the indisputable fact that the fault is the sitters regardless if the canines is aggressive or no longer. It truly wasn't the canines fault. He could no longer GET OUT again, it quite is the owner's duty to have the canines lower than administration in any respect cases. i think the electric powered fence might want to be a good again up for the present fence could the gate no longer be latched yet that does no longer recommend it might want to be left um latched and want the electric powered fence is adequate i'd not use the muzzle, socializing is a good idea plus a refresher direction in obedience using the sensible practise approach.

2016-12-04 10:12:32 · answer #5 · answered by hamiton 4 · 0 0

Did you ever see those newspaper pictures of kids who were bit in the face by vicious dogs? I am sure their parents value them more than the dogs. If your family had someone in it that was killed by a dog attack would you still have that righteous view about how dogs are not less important? It is a matter of common sense. Think it over and be realistic.

2006-10-08 09:28:58 · answer #6 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 2 1

We can kill both chaotically vicious dogs and chaotically vicious people. And we should. However, there is a proper place for ordered violence.

For example, guard dogs are trained to be violent, but only on certain conditions. A guard dog schooled to inflict violence only against criminal intruders is doing good service because the criminal's violence was chaotic. Likewise for a good policeman, who understand that there are times when inflicting violence is a good thing.

It's not violence per se that is bad; it's chaos that is bad. All life's activities, both violent and serene, should be directed toward the attainment of high goals and circumstances, which requires discipline and order. Chaos, both violent and serene, works contrary to those attainments, and for that reason it is the same thing as evil.

2006-10-08 10:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by David S 5 · 1 1

Its not right, humans arent even the smartest beings in this world, on universe 'The Greys' an ailen species that works with the government *See the roswell insedint* Are MUCH more advanced then humans, humans like to seem in control, when one creture, a visous dog in this case, kill people, we think that 'Oh no! it must go, it is hurting people' Its the way of life, we die, weather it is by some dog, a lion, or other people. human have come up with many bad things, War, guns, fosil fules, And now humans put down animals so they can be more in control. So yeah its not right.

2006-10-08 09:42:15 · answer #8 · answered by SeijuxChan 2 · 0 3

If a dog is dangerous and attacks people particularly children, then the only safe option unfortunately is to put it down. A good long prison sentence for the owners would also be a good idea. Unfortunately more difficult to achieve.

2006-10-08 09:33:17 · answer #9 · answered by MARIA C 2 · 1 1

Are you serious? I can't believe you would put a dog's life before a baby's safety. You can't lock a dog up in a kennel for the rest of its life as that would be more cruel than putting it to sleep. If you seriously think that an animal's life is as important as a human's then I hope you are strictly vegan at the very least.

2006-10-08 09:27:36 · answer #10 · answered by stienbabe 4 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers