How far, in your opinion, can you go before generalising the population of a country/ creed becomes second nature.
For instance, whilst on holiday I met a large contingent of other tourists from another country. They were, without exception, acting like as*holes, but I told myself, 'these guys are just bad ambassadors for their country- it's bound to be a nice place in reality,'. Them some months later, I visited their country (well, only one city) and, as before everyone I met had the same intolerant, anti-social traits. So I said, 'no, they aren't all like this- I'm just biased because of my previous encounter,'.
Then I get back home, and this country is on the news, and everyone around me is saying, 'what as*holes!'
So my question is, even though it might not be ethical, can you reach a stage where it is understandable to categorise an entire country, even though there might still be 1 or 2 good souls there?
2006-10-08
09:19:05
·
9 answers
·
asked by
DaveyMcB
3
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture