English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If evololution is true and we go far back enough, how did the first living little critter ( cell-sized presumably) come to be? We know that living matter cannot be created from non-living matter. So I find it hard to comprehend, how did that huge leap happen?

2006-10-08 08:59:57 · 6 answers · asked by ☻Cool Beans☺ 2 in Science & Mathematics Biology

6 answers

The right chemicals found themselves in the right puddle and became a cell. Just the right place at the right time, and it probably took millions of years of these chemicals exisiting for them to create an organism by chance. Therefore, if we figured out how to we could create new organic cells, but it would be a lot of work and scientific research and development, perhaps some of the original chemicals don't even exisit anymore.

2006-10-08 09:04:12 · answer #1 · answered by locomonohijo 4 · 1 0

Its not a question about evolution. Evolution does not deal with the creation of life, rather the changes that occur in life. Evolution defined by genetic and ecological terms is the changes in genotype (as a result the phenotype) frequencies over time. This occurs everyday and can be seen all around you.

The creation of life is much harder to determine. See life has to occur just once for it to continue. It probably occured through the presence of many organic material and amino acids, and some unlikely, rare occurance happened (maybe lightening) and life popped up. Its not a big deal about how life created, but what life does.

2006-10-08 16:21:16 · answer #2 · answered by An Agent of Chaos 5 · 0 0

If you can answer that one, you have a good chance of a Nobel prize.

" We know that living matter cannot be created from non-living matter"

I would have to argue that point, as it obviously did, at some stage, unless you want to believe that a god went "Kerpow", which still leaves the question; Where did the god come from?

2006-10-08 16:03:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Darwin said, "There are many key points missing, that are needed in order to prove evolution".
The missing link fossils have never been found. So there is no proof of the transitional species.

2006-10-08 17:23:36 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin H 7 · 1 1

No one knows they had a big debate about it last year. Where did God come from?? Where did animals come from where did they first start no one knows!!!!

2006-10-08 16:05:56 · answer #5 · answered by sexygrl 2 · 0 0

you are not muslim right? islam says it all first there was adam and howa they were in heaven and god sent them to the earth then they reproduces and then you and me are a live

2006-10-08 16:10:05 · answer #6 · answered by il kindome di cielo₪ 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers