English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I say yes - we go in and kill the Nazi-facist president and the religous fundamentalist Ayatollah. The crazy president called for the destruction of America and the annihilation of Isreal and the west. Then we should kick the religous fundies out of our own government. Retards like Pat Robertson and Bill Frist are turning the US into an Iran like theology.


For those retards on yahoo boards out there rooting for the destruction of America - shut the fu*k up because the internet and yahoo boards wouldn't exsist if it wasn't for American ingenuity.

2006-10-08 06:48:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

of course, we can't nuke them since only their government is corrupt - most of the Iranian people actually hate their government and don't hate America.

2006-10-08 06:55:32 · update #1

of course, we can't nuke them since only their government is corrupt - most of the Iranian people actually hate their government and don't hate America.

2006-10-08 06:55:40 · update #2

10 answers

We should not invade them. We would lose too many of our own kids. Nukes appear to be a pretty good option.

2006-10-08 06:50:55 · answer #1 · answered by Thanks for the Yahoo Jacket 7 · 1 2

Totally agree with Brainy....

If it's religious fanatics you are going after,
there goes the majority of war mongering ,
hatefilled , Bush supporters.

Bush supporters are folks who have
no active brain cells left because they
are addicted to Bushie's Speical Jesus Juice...
And now they are a bunch of pathetic lemmings.

2006-10-08 14:05:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We should try further diplomacy and sanctions and wait a while first.
Also, no American is rooting for the Destruction of our nation. Stop saying that stuff. It's offensive, and very untrue.

2006-10-08 13:58:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If there was someway that we could get some agents into the country that could work with the population towards a movement -- that would be the most logical way.

2006-10-08 14:36:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No invasion of Iran. We have mired ourselves in Iraq just as we did in Vietnam - for those of you who remember. We do not need another like Iraq.

Better to build up our stockpile of cruise missiles until the idiot in Iran does something really stupid and then surgically excise him and his nuclear program without setting foot in Iran.

2006-10-08 14:28:06 · answer #5 · answered by 63vette 7 · 1 0

We shouldn't go into Iran until he does something stupid. Which he will. The European Community and the UN need to be on this guy like white on rice. If the fool reaches our shores with anything, Iran will be a hole in the ground. Guaranteed. We won't need to send troops in. There will be nothing left to invade.

2006-10-08 13:54:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

If it's religious fanatics you are going after, there goes the majority of war mongering , hatefilled , Bush supporters.

2006-10-08 13:55:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

First the self-righteous idiots who think of themselves as the world police.

2006-10-08 13:52:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Clinton was the one who had the news media take pictures of him in black churches holding his Bible with tears running down his cheeks.
He would have made a good Radical Muslim.

2006-10-08 13:51:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

And why?

2006-10-08 13:58:44 · answer #10 · answered by pelister56 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers