English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

The British don't believe him anymore than you do. The media helps perpetuate the lies. People are furious but have no power anymore.

2006-10-08 06:34:17 · answer #1 · answered by Reba K 6 · 4 0

Well, to go against the accepted trend here, Tony Blair is no puppet of Bush, however he does believe that to get rid of a fascist dictator in the shape of Saddam Hussein was correct, as I do. Hussein committed genocide on various populations within in his own country. He attacked Iran, fired missiles into Israel and invaded Kuwait. Nice bloke and we will be better off without him. Pity that certain Muslim groups can't see this. The oppressive west, colonialist and dictatorial, yeah right, get a life and understand what is good for you. We don't want to be there, might as well get out and let the real bloodshed start, Muslim on Muslim, however our leaders have to big a respect for the people of Iraq. I exclude Bush from the last statement. What really gets up my nose is the vast majority of pundits who have no idea of history, national interests or politics. Quite frankly most of those who have offered opinions so far should not be allowed to vote. They probably don't anyway. They have have no understanding of the real issues involved. If they did, their comments wouldn't be so crass.

2006-10-08 14:21:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The majority of people in england believe that both Bush and Blair are idiots but they have been voted in because they have had the support of certain business concerns who will make money from the wars.
We cannot get rid of them yet but there are more of the same waiting in the background and we also have to face the spectre of being ruled by Europe.
The revolution is coming and when the dust has settled the british political parties will no longer be recognisable. I hope that the many well meaning people in politics are around to pick up the pieces and bring respectability to our country.

2006-10-08 09:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The real reason for going to war in Iraq is that it was instructed by the powers that be that run the world, and control most of the governments, and the UN.
They are called by several names, such as The Illuminati, New World Order, Fourth Reich, The Elite, Bunderburgers, Zionists, and Globalists.
They consist of a small number of very rich and very powerful families, who have an agenda to control the entire planet, dispose of over half the people, and enslave the remainder.
They are the ones who provide instructions to government, and any president or prime minister who does not comply with these instructions ends up like JFK.

Through the secret service departments, which they also control, they create various false-flag terrorist events, in an effort to justify war. 9/11 is such a case.

An Illuminati Primer
http://www.rinf.com/news/nov05/illuminati.html

Rothschild/Rockefeller
The Architecture of Modern Political Power
http://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/fourthreich/rockroth.html

2006-10-10 18:11:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There were HUGE protests in UK against joining Bush in his war for stealing others oil and other exploitation, but all was ignored. The British refer to him as Bush's poodle, but there's all this corporate power supporting him, and that's all that matters...in a world in which less than five hundred wealthiest have more assets that of over 40% of the population of the world (and check this out, this is from UN), what do you expect?!

2006-10-08 08:02:44 · answer #5 · answered by peace m 5 · 2 0

You reckon eh? Nearly 85% of the British Public do not support the war in Iraq nor the invasion of Afghanistan, of these 55% never did support it. That's hardly a country blinding following it's own leadership nor anyone else's is it??

2006-10-08 06:45:16 · answer #6 · answered by bumbleboi 6 · 1 0

Don't know how you think all England beleive him, we have lost faith in him, he won't be getting voted back in, nobody wants a war, we want the British soldiers home, let Bush fight his own war.

2006-10-08 06:41:00 · answer #7 · answered by braveheart321 4 · 2 1

If there is data that those 2 broke any regulations or did something unlawful they could desire to have their day in courtroom. In courtroom they could be shown harmless or to blame. in the event that they have been shown harmless then each and every of the communicate of incorrect doings could be over. on the different hand if discovered to blame then they could desire to be punished. In my life time Richard Nixon replace into discovered to blame of ordering the ruin in of the Democratic workplaces and he lost the job of President of america. If Bush has committed against the regulation he isn't any greater desirable than Nixon and could be prosecuted for any crime committed. each and every of the human beings asserting there could desire to be no trial could desire to nicely known something others in easy terms wager. If there is not any data of against the regulation then their names could be cleared. For any regulation abiding citizen it extremely is the marvelous and suitable thank you to settle accusations.

2016-12-13 04:23:07 · answer #8 · answered by vogt 4 · 0 0

Read, mark & digest Chariotme's answer, the only one displaying any intelligent assessment of recent history. Ignore the media-brain-washed morons who have no thought-out opinionsof their own.

2006-10-12 00:19:32 · answer #9 · answered by artleyb 4 · 0 0

Bush has small fingers and uses plenty of lube, so it's quite easy for him really.

2006-10-08 09:40:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers