Is that the best example for America's youth?
2006-10-08 06:20:42 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, no it isn't, *lol*. :) And the mind boggles, doesn't it, that people who wouldn't get hired at Burger King to flip burgers or tend to fries are the ones running for office.
I mean, by that standard of competence, *I* should be Emperor of the Earth by now, right?? :)
And in case you are wondering, *yes* there *was* a drunk driving conviction in 1976, *yes* there was a desertion, it is in writing, the proof is there. Bite me.
But yeah, it is just appalling that all these rich punks were able to get away with *buying* out the highest office in the land and just putting some crackhead in charge.
Oh well....I'd best stop before I get too nasty with the comments. We all know who needs killin' mind you, but still, Yahoo doesn't like it when *real people* cut loose ("real people" being defined as non-troll, non-evangelical, non-bot and non-spammer...you know, the folks who *don't* get away with Murder on Answers).
Have a good one! ;)
2006-10-08 06:33:11 · answer #1 · answered by Bradley P 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well, let's examine...you could have been a member for a whopping 3 days, and feature already headquartered your self as an uneducated, in the back of-the-occasions Bush-basher. How's that suppose? To deliver you as much as present parties: the document of that you talk used to be verified through even probably the most liberal media to be fake, fraudulent, and simply simple flawed. Dan Rather ran a tale at the information approximately this, and gave the look of an fool first-class while the tale proved to be a lie. This little mistake on his side is what precipitated him to retire from broadcasting. So simply in which have been you while all this used to be taking place? Or are you simply looking to dredge up whatever to bash the President? Listing the files that nobody has visible is not anything lower than a dull, lame, and futile strive at posting a pink herring...the evidence isn't what he did not exhibit, however what he did - particularly, pay files indicating that he used to be reward as he used to be required to be. And in order that you'll be able to recognize, genius, there may be NO bigger evidence of carrier than evidence of pay...y'see, the army is humorous approximately paying persons for matters that they did not do. They'd alternatively no longer do this, so it is a lovely definite factor that for those who obtained paid, you probably did what you have been meant to do. The most effective "drawback" I see here's that you are up to now out of contact with fact that you simply deserve pity...however you will not get it from me.
2016-08-29 06:04:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just goes to show you, America is the land of opportunity. You forgot to add, "Commander in Chief" of the most powerful armed forces the world has ever known. And not capable of keeping a "Train of thought" going for more than 3 minutes. People get who they vote for, sorry, that's not quite true either. I have to be wrong there because only in at least a semi-fascist state could that happen. And for we Canadians, the worst part is we just elected a Conservative A** kissing Prime Minister who is also a God fearing, evangelical type who really believes Bush speaks only to God. There might be some truth in that because there have been times, that I've heard him speak and I couldn't understand him. Maybe he was Speaking in Tongues. The saving grace for us is Harper only has a Minority Government so if he gets to out of line(or lost in space) the opposition can bring his Government down. Have a nice Holiday weekend, it's our Thanksgiving, we are not to big on Columbus.
2006-10-08 06:42:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why of course it is - wouldn't you be proud of your child if they turned out like Dubya? He's someone to be looked up to and be emulated by every young person in America....a shining star and a guiding light.
This of course is making the assumption that your child has an IQ of less than 20 and hasn't got the sense God gave a goose.
2006-10-08 08:14:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's the best example of how being born privileged, into a wealthy and powerful family, can open doors that would never ever have opened based solely on merit. Bush was an underacheiver in school, this is undisputed fact. And now many many more people are coming to understand that he is an underacheiver as president too.
2006-10-08 06:27:42 · answer #5 · answered by ratboy 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
YES! he was all of those things but the worst example for Americas youth is the lying, war mongering, torture and murder, not to mention we are loosing our freedoms that our forefathers died for.
TIME TO WAKE UP AMERICA!
2006-10-08 06:53:18 · answer #6 · answered by 76tb97t6ht 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If sports celebs don't have to be role models, why should politicians?
Seriously, the government and the media are not interested in your children.
Not in the way you would like, anyway.
But they'll spin this, too.
2006-10-08 06:32:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Those are the only qualities that I understand. I know addictive people. I know party types. I don't know cold blooded killers (even if killed with a pen not a gun), draft dogers and liars. These are qualities I do not understand.
2006-10-08 06:30:30 · answer #8 · answered by chante 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, it sure isn't, but he didn't win by acclamation anyway, did he??!! But, I'd hate to see the mess we'd be in with that silly Kerry and his pitiful wife. Too bad the former Vice-president didn't win, as he had the rightful votes.
2006-10-08 06:42:32 · answer #9 · answered by enchiladagirltacomaniacmurraylov 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush and Cheney don't have that archetypal radiance that we should want in a leader. And now they are leaders. They make terrible and unethical decisions every month, and i refuse to support them.
2006-10-08 06:22:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋