English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-08 05:29:28 · 28 answers · asked by darweesh s 1 in Politics & Government Politics

28 answers

Let's do it like Bush does.

Disregard them and continue to attack oil rich countries. That will increase the number of terrorists and that info can then be used to scare the American public into submission and re-election of the cronies.
When we continue to do that for a few decades, then there will be enough terrorists almost everywhere and we can use nuclear weapons on them.

Let's not try any other plan, because that would mean that we are weak on defense. Let's not rethink our strategy and approach and come up with something intelligent. THAT would be unamerican.

2006-10-08 06:23:11 · answer #1 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0 0

According to the Democrats, ask them nicely what the next plot to kill us is, assign them court appointed lawyers,make sure that they are treated like they are in a five star hotel and finally release them after a short time to go back to their terrorist buddies.Only then can we claim "moral superiority" over them before they kill all of us.Does that sound about right?

2006-10-08 05:43:17 · answer #2 · answered by Michael 6 · 0 0

Like the black man who burned my home down for me flying the flag of the south. I believe shooting him if he came back to my property again.would be an appropriate responce. another option, lock him up. for along time.there was man in north Carolina. who was beaten to death in front of his wife and little girl for flying the battle flag. in memory of his ancesters.these are terrorist actions.. I was at the park and a black man robed me. kicked my ribs till they broke puctured my lung allmost died. terrorism is rampant in this country. I do not know how to respond. you take each case and deal with it.eather that are nuke em all. ha ha now for me I have been taught to forgive people. but we must protect ourselfs, I do not think killing a hundred thousand innocent iraqis was a good idea, to take out one man.they should have assasinated him.makeing it clear that there will be a nucleor responce to any country that is behind any future mass killings in the u.s. would be a good idea.Prayer is allways a good thing to do,God Bless America

2006-10-08 05:43:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I DONT GET IT. Some one explain this to me. EVERYONE HATES THEM, right?

Republican party is the party that goes to hunt these guys down (Republican party is the party of no negotiation and large military)

The Democrat party is known to hinder the military by large. In order to do this, you must downsize the military, you cant send citizens overseas without weapons and training to kill terrorists. (Good example of downsizing, CLINTON)

So you Democrats agree with the republicans with something, kill and hunt terrorists.

2006-10-08 05:50:38 · answer #4 · answered by tenacious_d2008 2 · 1 0

Like we deal with any other criminal. Prove him guilty in a court of law, and lock them up.

Unfortunately too many republicans have watched too many TV shows and think it is possible to get justice in other ways.

2006-10-08 05:56:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Send the republicans after them them. :

"The rumors about (Speaker Dennis Hastert) another top GOP member of the House being involved in sexual encounters with young "men for hire" are confirmed to WMR by well-placed sources in Washington's gay community. The member in question is House Speaker Dennis Hastert, whose "alternate" life style is the primary reason for him and his staff covering up the scandal involving ex-Florida GOP Rep. Mark Foley and his lewd messages sent to underage male congressional pages. Hastert's penchant to receive anal sex is well-known to our sources in DC's gay community. Additionally, Hastert's reported extremely small penis is the subject of many jokes among Washington's gay circles.


Wayne Madsen Report - Home
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

2006-10-08 05:32:53 · answer #6 · answered by Reba K 6 · 2 0

There are alot of variables you have to contend with first.
I mean what kind of terrorist, what group, what do they want, what would work.You cant just have one way to deal with them all.

2006-10-08 05:31:33 · answer #7 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 0 0

Democrats want to hug the terrorists, and then let them go.
They think that the terrorists will stop killing us if we treat them with kindness.

2006-10-08 05:34:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

"democrats think that if we treat terrorist with kindness theyll stop killing us"

Duh! If we followed a "support the middle east" campaign, terrorism would be a non issue ten years from now.

2006-10-08 05:36:58 · answer #9 · answered by khaoticwarchild 3 · 0 2

\/\/o\/\/ as much as we know I have stocked my home with extra water 100 gal. and a lot of food dry food and everything else i may need i don't think the us can stand the hard ship that means if we begin to suicide boom in the USA

2006-10-08 05:38:24 · answer #10 · answered by llauramcnulty 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers