When it comes to preying on children sexually, do the Republicans now have the Catholics beat?

Answer 1

What do Republicans and J.C.Penny have in common?
They both have little boys pants half off.

Answer 2

You are saying Republicans (plural) I don't think that one instance, of an obviously sick man, sending IMs and emails without sexual physical contact constitutes Republicans preying on children. It is amazing how liberals distort the facts about everything just for political gain. Do you remember Jerry Studds, Gary Condit (murderer), Bill Clinton, Barney Franks and the other sexual perverts in the Democrat Party? I am not condoning the conduct of Foley and if he broke any laws he needs to be sentenced to the maximum allowed by law. Unlike you and people like you I believe that justice should be served and not giving the perpetrator (Jerry Studds) three standing ovations on the house floor.

Answer 3

LOL! Catholic priests are still in the lead, with a lot longer record of abusing children, and having it covered up with bishops shifting their parishes, and paying "hush money" to victims.

At least the Church pays. Republicans are too stingy and moral to make it a money thing.

This happens in part beause prostitution is generally illegal. If people could go and have their sexual fantasies fulfilled by prostitutes, who are paid just as much for the reason to keep it all quiet and secret, as they are to just do the service, we would not have these scandals.

Answer 4

Actually, the religious preference of almost all pedophiles, (well over 75% of those in prisons) including many of those masquerading as so-called "Catholic priests," is over-whelmingly for the Atheist-Materialist religion.

As over 90% of those who practice the Atheist-Materialist religion are actually found on the hard-left or extreme liberal wing of the Democratic Party, the correct answer would seem to be the exact opposite of what you are suggesting.

A closer look at the actual philosophies of each side finds that The Catholics and the Republicans at their core both follow a moral and ethical system teaching that life is a sacred trust from some Divine Intelligence and that children require our vigilent protection as they constitute our greatest treasure and most sacred responsibility.

The militant Atheist-Materialist and extreme liberal Democrats on the other hand firmly believe that "all morality is subjective" and that "Life" is nothing more than a stuggle between animals for "survival of the fittest." In their core beliefs, there is no difference between kidnapping, raping and murdering your neighbor's 10 year-old daughter then throwing her broken body in the ditch like a discarded beer can; and eating a bucket of fried chicken. Both are simply examples of a "more fit" animal using a "less fit" one for its immediate needs.

Therefore, it would seem to follow that "When it comes to preying on children sexually" the Atheist-Materialist and left wing Democrats, have EVERYONE beat!

Answer 5

What I see in your "question" and a number of the responses is a lot of bigotry against Catholics, which unfortunately has been a part of the dark side of our nation's heritage. Sexual predators come from ALL political parties and ALL religions (and lack of religion), and you have no right or reason to claim that Republicans or Catholics have any greater percentage of sexual predators than any other group.

Answer 6

Well, obviously, they are already in that leading position, even beating the catholic priests involved in similar situations!

Answer 7

Definitely. Unlike the totally corrupt Republican Party, the Catholic Church has its good points.

Answer 8

Not by a long shot. They have not even beat the Democrats.

Answer 9

No one can beat the Democrats when it comes to preying on children.
That's just what Democrats do.
And raise taxes on working people.
That's how they get their kicks.

Answer 10

i didnt know that non sexually explicit emails to 16 yr olds and IMs to 18 yr olds makes a man a sexual predator of children, gay or not.