Was it worth spending $40 million to prove Clinton had sex?

Question

Do you think it was worth $40 million of your taxes for Ken Starr to prove Bill Clinton had inappropriate relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky?

Answer 1

No.

More to the point, the investigation of the Plame leak has been done for a small fraction of the cost - and the matter is actually relevant to national security.

Answer 2

40 mil was nothing compared to the boost to the newspaper and television economy. But I guess you are right, if we have an amoral person as president, we should not complain or do anything about his behavior. The president has the right to disgrace his wife, and embarrass the country that he represents. We should shut up and let such a president and his drugged out musician brother, run things and mind our own business.

Answer 3

Another $40 million wasted.

Answer 4

Not at all. It was a colossal waste of public money!
Now, Mr.Folley! Is the government going to spend a similar amount on yet another trivial investigation leading to nothing?

Answer 5

you're asking 2 questions: why did they spend it on Clinton and why did no longer they spend it on -- despite. in the event that they did no longer spend it on Clinton -- maximum of which replace into in all probability sunk fees, besides -- it might greater desirable than in all probability have long gone to a minimum of something else that replace into stupid, like yet yet another Robert Byrd Memorial (fill interior the sparkling) in RB's domicile state of West Virginia. Why did no longer they spend it on Bin weighted down? First, might $40M have made that plenty distinction? we are speaking a undertaking that finally finally ends up taking billions, no longer thousands and thousands. 2d, might monitoring down Bin weighted down have accomplished plenty reliable besides? it might have accomplished some reliable, little question, however the bigger concern is that Bin weighted down has an objective audience and that objective audience is unlikely away. To get rid of that pool of people who're very prepared to take heed to Bin weighted down and his ilk, we'd could desire to get rid of poverty interior the middle east or grant opportunities or get rid of repressive governments or -- you call it. And back, might $40M have accomplished the trick there? surprisingly no longer likely. the priority with your question, in case you do no longer innovations my asserting so, is which you're assuming A finally ends up in B (or for this reason, A -- spending funds prosecuting Clinton -- would not have further approximately B -- monitoring down Bin weighted down). in certainty, the two have little or no if something to do with one yet another. it extremely is the fallacy of numerous those arguments: on paper they sound related yet certainly they make no sense. i think human beings puzzled why we spent the money on Vietnam -- which maximum human beings see as an abject failure -- whilst we could have spent it on, say, eIiminating poverty. My concept approximately it extremely is, Vietnam replace into a minimum of partly directed in direction of the removal of the Soviet danger. finally the Soviet empire collapsed upon itself, a minimum of partly simply by fact they could no longer spend the money to compete with us. If Vietnam replace into an significant area of this bankrupting of the Soviets (which i think of it replace into), then replace into it valuable? might diverting the money to battling poverty have finally not on time the autumn of the Soviet Union? who's to declare. yet once you play those what if video games you advance those subject concerns.

Answer 6

Why do you care if it was paid for with tax payer money. The first thing a Democrat does when he/she gets in office is raise taxes. They have already said if they take back control of the congress the first thing they are going to do is repeal President Bush's tax cuts. So, the better question is do you think its worth voting for a Democrat who is going to raise your taxes, Take money out of your pocket to pay for all the social handout programs?

Answer 7

No, that was about one of the stupidest things that money was ever spent on. Bill's infidelity should have been only his, and Hilary's problem.

Answer 8

yes i do,he could of said, i watched her do herself with a cigar and whacked off as i wattched and spued all over that ***** in her blue dress and saved us 40 million to cover up another lie..remember the whitewater deal and the cattle stock deal..hmmmmmmmmm.

Answer 9

no but he is a draft dodging liar that was under federal investigation when he ran for prez the first time

Answer 10

Hell no, you know that! I am speechless with frustration right now to hear that kind of money went to the investigation. Is it true?